Mary Letourneau: Freed by Death at Age 58

I was surprised, and deeply saddened, to learn, just recently, that Mary died of cancer on July 6, 2020. She was only 58. In death as in life for over 20-years since 1997, she was defined and vilified as a “rapist” (and, less frequently, a “pedophile” and “child molester”) in myriads if not millions of articles and stories and headlines in all organs of a mass media that cast and turned her into the most infamous and widely despised woman sex criminal in US and world history.: “rapist,” “rape,” child rape,” “child rapist,” “convicted of seducing and raping her 12-year-old student,” “sentenced to prison for child rape,” ad nauseam.

All lies, canards, and distortions and inversions of reality both in regard to the perversion of language -for obvious anatomical reasons, women can’t commit rape in the pure and literal sense of the word- and the actions and motives of the “rapist” and her “victim” in that Mary was not even the aggressor and initiator and seductress. I discuss all this in more detail in the preceding articles.

For those who don’t believe in miracles and the supernatural, mind/body dualism, the soul and afterlife, death is oblivion, nothingness, the cessation of consciousness, the end of pain and suffering, liberation and surcease from the hell that is other people, the annihilation of a lifetime of memories in which for most people the bad and worse far exceed the good and better.

For Mary, the memories that died when she died include being arrested, her wrists in handcuffs with her arms behind her back, stuffed in the back of a police car and driven to jail where she was “booked” and strip-searched, her vagina and rectum violated with fingers in rubber gloves in the search for “contraband” and enslaved in a cage, a cell with one or two other women, or perhaps a large holding cell, until she was released on bail; then indicted for “child rape,” prosecuted, convicted, and enslaved for 6-months in jail and then 7 1/2 years in prison violating a “no-contact order” by seeing her “victim” and having sex with him again and becoming pregnant a second time (she gave birth to both infants while incarcerated), separated for almost a decade of her life from her 6-children and the “victim” with whom she was “madly in love,” literally, exactly why I don’t. With whom and why a woman “falls in love” is one of the eternal mysteries of life but I fear and suspect that her madness was induced at least in part if not largely by white guilt and the race of her “victim” and paramour.

And after he release from prison, she endured who knows how many years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration surveillance and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration and, even worse, demonization and vilification for over 20-years as a “rapist,” “child rapist,” “child molester,” “child sex abuser,” “predator,” monster and degenerate, as the most infamous and despised women sex criminal in all of US and world history.

If there is a soul and afterlife, and she’s in heaven, as a Christian who believes that Jesus was/is the “son of God” who was born of a virgin and was resurrected after his death by crucifixion, she be tormented by all these and other memories forever, for millions and billions and trillions and for all eternity. But death is like falling asleep, with no dreams, and not waking -and thus, blessedly, her torment is over, memories of her “hell on earth” are gone forever.

Time.com Summarizes the 22nd Most “Notorious Crime” of the “Past Hundred Years”

Tags

innate sex differences, Mary Letourneau, sex offenders, women sex offenders

What happens to a woman when she finds the man of her dreams, only he is a child? And if the woman is his teacher? American parents cringed at the story of Mary Kay Letourneau, who first met Vili Fualaau when she was his teacher in second grade. He did not start flirting with her until he was in sixth. She started to have sex with him the next year, when he was 13. Already the mother of four from a marriage that was disintegrating, she would bear the teenager’s daughter, but not before she ended up in prison on rape and molestation charges. She would then violate the rules for the suspension of her sentence by seeing him again -and becoming pregnant again. Letourneau’s beauty and struggles with manic depression made her illicit affair the fodder of tabloids and women’s magazine around the world. But there was something touching, if maddening, abut her refusal to renounce her love for the boy at the cost of her freedom. In 1998, after giving birth to her second child, she began serving a seven-year prison sentence. Released on parole in August 2004, she quickly married her young lover, who by then had turned 21. (Howard Chua-Eoan, “Mary Kay Letourneau’s Forbidden Love, 1978,” Time.com, 2007.)

Surprisingly, this account of her story is honest and accurate, neutral and objective, comparatively, in contrast to most of the media coverage, characterized and vitiated by falsehoods, intentional and unintentional, lies and canards, distortions and misinformation, rampant hysteria and tabloid sensationalism: the demonization of Mary as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” a description that was/is false, objectively and scientifically, and malicious and slanderous. And the depiction, equally false, of Vili as a “victim” of “rape” and “child molestation,” tantamount or comparable to a prepubertal girl of 11 or 12 who is too young and immature to consent to or initiate sex and who is a true victim of a perverse and predatory male, an adult or underage adolescent, who rapes and molests her. The MSM as a whole was less a source of factual and objective news than an agent and myrmidon of CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation.

This journalist doesn’t refer to Mary as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester.” Or Vili as a “victim.” He notes that he was 13, not 12, when they first had sex and that he started to flirt with her in sixth grade, conceding that he was the initiator of their sexual union but not exposing the nature and degree of his aggressions. It notes that her marriage was “disintegrating,” which implies that she didn’t destroy her marriage and betray her husband and desert her children by falling in love and having sex with Vili and twice becoming pregnant, but doesn’t mention that her marriage was “disintegrating,” primarily, because of her husband’s serial adulteries and philandering. She was finally going to divorce him after years of betrayal and infidelity, apparently, and perhaps he wanted to divorce her because he fell in love with and wanted to marry or live with another woman? And in describing her love for Vili as “touching” and her “struggles with manic depression,” he’s commiserative, mildly, rather than censorious.

It’s true that he was “only” 13, not 12, when they first had sex. But it’s also true that he was pubescent at age 10, “sexually-active” at age 12, for sure, and possibly even 11, and probably had more sexual partners, perhaps far more, at age 13 than did Mary at age 33. Raised as a Catholic, strictly and devoutly, it’s possible that the only man Mary had sex with before Vili was her husband. And Vili was the aggressor in their sexual union, forcing himself on her the first time they had intercourse. In response to my comments, she confirmed in one of the many letters we exchanged that the first time they had intercourse was “against my will.”

So, given such facts, his level of maturity was closer to that of a typical 16- or 17-old as opposed to a typical 13-year-old. In regard to maturity, the age of puberty, intelligence, sexual experience, etc, the nature of 13-year-old varies significantly. Millions of 13- and 14-year-olds, especially if pubescent at age 10 or 11 or 12, are more or far more intelligent, mature, “sexually-active,” sexually-experienced, etc., than millions of 16- and17-year-olds.

(For the record, which is pertinent, I was an atheist at age 10, when I was still a child, biologically, agnostic at 8 and 9 as I vaguely remember, and pubescent at age 11, which reveals a level of maturity far beyond my numerical age. And Vili was pubescent at age 10.)

The obligatory lie or canard that began in 1997 and continues to this day, over 20-years later, is that Mary “seduced” and “raped” the “child” and “little boy” when he was only 12-years-old. The commenters and reporters who say and write this are either lying or misinformed. Are they ignorant of the facts or are they lying to make her “crimes” appear more “heinous” and “shocking” and to give the absurd depiction and vilification of Mary as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester” a spurious credibility and gravitas. Unlike Vili and many others, most 12-year-olds are prepubescent. Prepubertal 12-year-olds are children, biologically, whereas most 13-year-olds are pubescent, and also teenagers.

Mary Letourneau’s Love Affair with Vili Fualaau the 22nd most “Notorious” Crime of the Century!

Tags

Mary Letourneau, sex offenders

On May, 2, 2009, I published an article at moraloutrage.net entitled “Mary Letourneau: Over a Decade of Lies, Hatred, Nonsense, Hysteria, and lunacy” which begins by noting that Times.com lists the “Crimes of the Century, the top 25: On the 75th anniversary of the Lindbergh kidnapping, TIME looks back at the notorious crimes of the past hundred years.”

Mary’s love affair with Vili Fualaau ranks as number 22, not quite as “notorious” as the Lindbergh kidnapping, the abduction and murder of an infant by a monster who was summarily executed, and monsters even worse, crimes even worse, even far worse, legions of them: the Black Dahlia, Richard Speck, Tate Murders, Son of Sam, John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, O.J. Simpson, the Unabomber, JonBenet Ramsey, Versace Killings, and a few others, but more “notorious” than Columbine and “The Scream” and myriads of other heinous crimes involving murder, mass murder, serial murder, terrorism, abductions, enslavement, violent rape, gang-rape, aggravated assault, maiming, torture, mutilation, and cannibalism not included in the “top 25.” A love affair between a teacher and her student that resulted in the births of two daughters and a marriage after her release from prison that has lasted over 10-years is equated with the most hideous, execrable, nauseating, and shocking barbarism, cruelty, sadism, brutality, depravity, and terrorism. Yes, according to Time.com, Mary love affair with Vili is more “notorious” than the 9/11 terrorist attack in which over 3,000 people were murdered.

And this in a country in which, during the last 50 years to say nothing of the last century, almost a million people have been murdered, millions and millions of women and girls have been raped and gang-raped (and who knows how many men have been raped and gang-raped in prisons and jails?), and tens of millions of people of all races and both sexes have been the victims of not only rape and murder but aggravated assaults, shootings, muggings, armed robberies, car-jackings, abductions, home invasions, etc. Approximately 90-95% of such crimes have been committed by stereotypical criminals, overwhelmingly young males in their 20s and teens. And Mary is far more infamous and despised than all of these nameless and faceless criminals put together!!

Happy Thanksgiving, Abigail: 11/26/2020, the 6th Anniversary of her Conviction at Trial and Enslavement in Jail to Await Sentencing

On this date, November 26, exactly six years ago, the day before Thanksgiving, Abigail was convicted at trial of 3 counts of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct” and also the felony of “accosting a minor for immoral purposes” and jailed, immediately, enslaved for 7-weeks, the last 5-days of Nov. 2014 and all of Dec and the first 2-weeks of January, before she was sentenced, on Jan. 14, 2015, to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. She’s now been enslaved for 6-years and will be enslaved for over two more years, at least, followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian surveillance, harassment, mortification, rstrictions on her freedom and intrusions into her private life. Only death will free her.

Yes, happy Thanksgiving, Abigail. In deference to the holiday and its traditions, was she given a slice or two of dry and chewy turkey breast, or a piece of dark meat so tough and stringy as to be almost inedible, overcooked and “lukewarm,” so I’ve been told, when delivered to her in the bubble where she’s “housed” with 7 other prisoners, apparently, along with a small heap of soggy and tasteless dressing and/or mashed potatoes and canned peas or green beans or mixed vegetables and perhaps a dollop of cranberry sauce and a glass of milk or water or apple juice?

Beyond Insanity: And Abigail was Sentenced to 8-25 Years in Prison and a Lifetime of Draconian/Orwellian Persecution

To quote Fox News:

The man who randomly attacked a 92-year-old woman in New York City is a serial offender,,., Rashid Brimmage, 31, is a registered sex offender who has been arrested 103 times, including for alleged sexually abusing a 13-year-old….He was busted most recently on Tuesday and charged with assault against the 92-year-old women,…

Ten of Brimmage’s  65 unsealed arrests were for sex crimes, largely forcible touching, sex abuse, and public lewdness….Five of these instances involved Brimmage allegedly groping or touching his victims -one of whom was only 13-years-old…

Brimmage was arrested and charged with persistent sexual abuse after he rubbed his groin against a 13-year-old girl in the Bronx on June 5, 2019….

An NYPD spokesman told Fox News: “It’s deeply concerning that an individual with a penchant for unprovoked violence and a history of victimizing the most vulnerable continues to walk the streets of New York City despite a lengthy criminal record.” Another “source” called it “just crazy” and “just unbelievable.” (foxnews.com, June 17, 2020)

!03 arrests, including “forcible touching” and sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl, and who knows how many other crimes he’s committed, felonies and misdemeanors, sexual and non-sexual, for which he wasn’t even arrested, and he was free to walk the streets, completely unsupervised by law enforcement with no ankle-tether/”bracelet” for electronic monitoring, casually punching a 92-year-old lady in the head with the heel and palm of his left-hand, knocking her to the ground and causing her head to hit a fire hydrant, and strolling away, nonchalantly and carefree, turning his head and looking back for 2-3 seconds to see what occurred to his latest prey and victim, doubtless happy to see her lying on the pavement motionless.

And Abigail, a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries -and of which she’s innocent if telling the truth about her de jure “victim” raping and terrorizing her- was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can can never remove and public sex-offender registration with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet for all who have access to see, billions of people, and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

Sanctimonious and Sadistic Judge Sentences Laurie Mosher to 30-Months in Prison for having sex with a 17-year-old Male Student

Haase Throws the Book at Mosher, by Tony Palmeri, 12/11/2002:

Oshkosh Winnebago County Circuit Judge Robert Haase today sentenced former Oshkosh North Drama teacher Laurie Mosher to 6-years in the Wisconsin prison system, including 30-months behind bars and extended supervision. Mosher, who admitted earlier this year to having sexual relations with a 17 -year-old North student, cried hysterically as the sentence was read.

In making the sentence, Haase said he focused on three issues: (1) the seriousness of the crime, (2) Mosher’s rehabilitation needs, (3), the need to protect the public. Haase seemed unmoved by the crowd of Mosher supporters in attendance. In fact, when Mosher’s attorney protested that a $10,000 cash bail to release Mosher while she appeals was excessive, Haase said that supporters in attendance should just “chip in” and they could easily raise the cash.

Mosher’s attorney argued….that the crime was on the “lower scale of seriousness” given the fact that the victim was seventeen and a half at the time the sexual relationship started, and that Mosher should be sentenced to probation. He argued also that the press ran Laurie and her husband Mark “out of town.”  He also said that as a result of the newspaper coverage of the case, Mosher has received obscene mail including a nude photo of a man who included a pornographic letter.

Judge Haase argued that the age of the victim was not as important as the fact that he was a student and Mosher a teacher. The judge said the public trust had been violated by Mosher’s actions, and that part of protecting the public includes deterring such crimes from happening in the future….Laurie and Mark Mosher both delivered tearful statement to the court….(uwosh.edu/faculty, palmeri, mosher.htm)

“Seriousness of the crime”: Mosher’s “crime” was so serious that it would have been a legal act in nearly all other nations (save Muslim countries, a different world and story altogether), including European countries; legal in most U.S. states for adults not in positions of authority over their underage teenage paramours; and a misdemeanor in Wisconsin and a few other states for adults not in positions of authority over their underage adolescent lovers.

“Mosher’s rehabilitation needs”: i.e., mandatory “sex-offender treatment” and intensive psycho-therapy, “treatment” and therapy for what exactly, heterosexuality?

“The need to protect the public”: Mosher is a 5′,2′, 110 lb. woman, now 57-years-old, with no history or violence or prior criminality, a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum “crime” who’s never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger to re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age. I’m 99.99%  certain that not one woman teacher who was convicted of having sex with a male student has re-offended by transporting another young man under statutory age to sexual paradise. And I’m sure none have re-offended by committing aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, burglaries, home invasions. kidnapping, torture, murder, and other mala in se crimes.

Mosher should not have even been charged with a crime, not even a misdemeanor. She should have been punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of her license and expulsion from the profession -which is more that punishment enough for having consensual sex with a 17-year-old male student and sufficient to deter virtually all other women teachers from having sex with students -in addition to the non-legal punishments of TV news and frontpage media-coverage and, consequently, hate-mail, death threats(?), obscene letters, photos of male genitalia, that drove her and her husband “out of town.”

Criminal justice vocations -police of all categories, prosecutors, judges, guards in jails and prisons- are ideal jobs for those who love to blight and destroy the lives of people who are not violent and dangerous, especially first-offenders  convicted of nonviolent and usually victimless and often mala prohibita crimes, and thus attract the sadistic and/or sanctimonious. This loathsome judge was both sadistic, gratuitously and excessively and inquisitorially cruel, and sanctimonious, a modern-day witch-burner, a new-age Cotton Mather. He obviously reveled in the anguish of Mosher and her husband and many supporters, and joyously swam and bathed, metaphorically, in her “river of tears” and those of her family and friends and colleagues.

Abigail Simon: A life-Sentence of Draconian/Orwellian Persecution

Tags

registry, sex offender registry, sex offenders

But a sentence of 8-25 years in prison is not punishment enough for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts or possibly misdemeanors (?) in dozens of other nations, including European Countries. Nor is it protection enough for all the boys and girls of Michigan and the United States, including not only biological men under the legal age of consent such as her “victim’ but also young women under statutory age and prepubertal children of both sexes.

Given the decision of the Supreme Court of Michigan not to hear her final appeal, she’ll be enslaved for 8-years, at least, and perhaps longer. But if she doesn’t die in prison she’ll still be punished until the day she dies. When she’s released from prison after “only” 8 or 10 or 12 years(?), she’ll be subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian “supervision,” probably including “sex-offender treatment,” restrictions on her freedom and intrusions into her private life that not even dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have imagined and prophesized decades ago, most of which don’t apply to violent criminals on probation who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense, and registration for life as a uniquely vile and execrable and dangerous criminal -her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet for all to see in Michigan’s and national sex-offender registries- unlike myriads of brutes and savages who’ve committed many if not dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se felonies but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped and gang-raped men in prisons and jails and/or women and adolescent girls in the free world.

But not even all this is enough to punish Abigail and similar “convicted sex offenders,” and to protect all the children of Michigan and the United States (if allowed to move to or visits other states) from this uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal. And also adults, apparently. And thus her draconian and Orwellian sentence also includes a life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” that she can never remove.

To CSA victimologists and the ruling-elites and governing-classes they’ve successfully indoctrinated, most balefully and crucially those who enact and impose the laws and sentences and punishments (politicians, police, prosecutors, judges, etc.), and a media that controls the zeitgeist and public opinion, and tens of millions of people they’ve brainwashed, Abigail is viewed as such a danger to children  -from infants in their cradles to teenage criminals one day short of their 16th or 18th birthdays- that she must wear this tether or “bracelet,” as cumbersome as it’s conspicuous, 24-hours a day, in public and private: at work and play and leisure, when shopping, dining, walking the streets, sitting in a park, reading in a library, etc., and at home, waking and sleeping, having sex with a lover or spouse (assuming her parole agent permits this?), bathing, showering, etc.(Apparently, the device is waterproof so the tethered can’t be shocked when bathing or swimming.)

Shortly before her release from prison after 8 or 10 or 12 years, I assume the guards will strip her naked for the last time and then attach the tether to her bare ankle, probably with the assistance and under the supervision of a parole officer and/or SVU detective,  before she dresses in her own clothes and leaves the prison with family and/or friends.

She and myriads of other people whose one and only crime in life was having a liaison or tryst with a young man or women under statutory age can never remove this tether/ “bracelet.” Imagine the mortification, the embarrassment, the daily interaction with and responses and actions of other people for the rest of their lives or at least 20-30 years: e.g, for a woman at the beach, or a pool or gym or health club, or wearing shorts on warm days, or a dress or skirt at church or a wedding or party or restaurant, and so forth. The new-age scarlet letter.

And envision what if must be like having sex, for both the men and women who are tethered and their partners, lovers or spouses, whose ankles and feet and calves are bruised and even cut by the plastic during coitus or when lying in bed and sleeping, The constant discomfort, the itching, and also blisters, chafing, and rashes from a devise that must be worn 24-hours a day under all conditions. I assume the tether can be removed so cuts and rashes and blisters can be treated by a doctor, but only with the permission of and in the presence of a parole-officer and/or SVU detective.

If she lives to be 88 or 94 or 102, senile, blind or half-blind, confined to a wheelchair, living in a nursing home, or immobile and supine in a hospital bed, dying of cancer or simply old-age, even if unconscious, she must wear this tether until she dies and its removed by the authorities. And so, too, with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet in Michigan’s and national sex offender registries.. Only then will all the children of Michigan and all of America and the entire world be safe from this monster and degenerate.

So her life after prison -whether she dies in her 70s or 80s or 90s- will be worse in some ways than her life in prison. At least in prison she isn’t forced to wear an ankle-tether 24 hours a day and she can’t she receive hate-mail,  death threats, and obscene lust-letters with photos of male genitalia -the fate of many women on the public registry. And she can’t be raped and doesn’t have to worry about being raped because, as of now, male guards are not allowed in the housing units because of a scandal and lawsuit by hundreds of women who were raped by male guards at another prison that was closed shortly thereafter. And she can’t be murdered, tortured, or assaulted non-sexually, brutally, viciously, and sadistically, by male criminals, and doesn’t have to worry about same until she’s released from prison.

And, moreover, the second stage of her draconian/Orwellian sentence -if she’s released from prison after 8-years and if she dies in her 70s or 80s or even 90s or hundreds- will be 3 or 4 or even 5 or 6 times longer

All this for a women who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger” to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age -an infinitely remote possibility that no sane person would obsess over during the day or lose any sleep over at night. In reality as opposed to fantasy, not a single person in the state of Michigan, child and adult, has been or will be any safer because of the enslavement of Abigail Simon for at least 8-years followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian persecution. No violent or other serious crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian life-sentence. In respect to “protecting the public” and children and deterring and preventing violent and other serious criminality, her grotesque sentence is wholly gratuitous, “cruel and unusual” in the sense of being not only cruel but also totally unnecessary.

She’s enslaved, broken, degraded, immiserated, her life ruined, doomed until she dies, forever a victim of mass psychosis, hysteria, ignorance, fanaticism, “moral panic,” ideology, politics, and the resultant oppression, cruelty, iniquity,, and persecution. And for what? For nothing -for no exigent, rational,  imperative, and justifiable reason whatsoever- for those of us who are sane and just and honest and realistic.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity!

 

The Witch-Burning of Abigail Simon

Tags

Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, sex offender registry, women as rapists, women sex offenders

On Nov. 26, 2014, in Grand Rapids, MI, Abigail Simon (a former tutor at a Catholic high school) was convicted at trial of three counts of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a felony with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years, for allegedly having sex with a  male student who, according to her testimony in court and statements to SVU detectives and prosecutors when interrogated,  was not only the aggressor in their sexual intrigue but also forced himself on her 3 times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; and also the felony of “accosting a minor for immoral purposes” for exchanging hundreds of emails and text messages with her “victim,” a 6’3″, 220 lb. biological man of 15 and football star who initially confessed to authorities and also testified under oath at a pretrial hearing that Abigail’s version of what occurred was true but later recanted and claimed not only that he didn’t force himself on her but also that she was the initiator of their liaison and controlled the action and relationship. She told the authorities and testified in court that she responded to his hundreds of emails and text-messages to keep him away from her because she didn’t want to have sex with him and was afraid of him for the reasons above.

So what occurred, exactly? Who is telling the truth and who is lying? Only one of them or both to some degree? Only Abigail and her “victim,” nameless and faceless, know the answers, And I’m sure their memories, and interpretations of same, differ.

According to a man who believed her testimony and was thus sympathetic to Abigail, commenting on the internet after her conviction, he recanted and changed his story after being threatened with charges of rape by prosecutors who were 100% certain that Abigail was “guilty” and wanted to prosecute her not only for “accosting a minor for immoral purposes,” a felony with a maximum-sentence of 4-years in prison and other mandatory punishments, but also “first-degree criminal sexual conduct.”

On Jan. 14, 2015, the judge was “merciful,” imposing the mandatory-minimum sentence of “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet and public sex-offender registration. He conceded that she was not a “predator” who was likely to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age much less commit violent and other mala in se crimes, and that her “victim” also knew that their intrigue was “wrong” and was thus “partly responsible,’ even if he didn’t rape her and “control her life” by threats and manipulation.  Thus he was not a CSA victimologist, fanatical and dogmatic, at her sentencing. (This would later change, as we’ll see, for whatever reasons.) But he had no choice, no “discretion” to impose a sane and “just” and  rational sentence that would blight but not destroy her life.

Even if he had such discretion, however, he probably would have sentenced her to 4-6 years in prison if not longer rather than “only” 6-12 months in jail or 1-2 years in prison, knowing the hysteria and outrage that such “leniency” would provoke not only in Grand Rapids and Michigan but even nationwide: near universal condemnation, publicly and privately, indignation and rebukes and tirades from CSA victimologists, their votaries and voices in the mass media, and the tens of millions of people they’ve browbeat and/or brainwashed, including politicians, police, and prosecutors, judges and jurors. And also MRAs, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” and millions of people, overwhelmingly males of course but more females than one would expect, whom they’ve vitiated and duped to various degrees with their woman-hating vitriol and mendacity. And, probably, a fusillade and torrent of hate-mail, possibly including death threats,, and perhaps even assaults and/or vandalism.

Under the law and to many if not most people, in fantasy as opposed to reality, she was so dangerous, such a “threat to society” and all the children of Michigan, that she couldn’t be released on bond but had to be enslaved in jail for almost two months before sentencing. At her sentencing, in a drab unisex denim jumpsuit, with no makeup, her medium-brown hair in a pony-tail with the blonde “highlights” faded, in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons for well over 2-hours, so debilitated and mortified by fear and shame (not for her “crimes,” but the chains, the crowd, the circus, the cameras, etc.) and despair and lack of sleep that she could barely walk or even stand and almost collapsed twice, she appeared to be on the verge of a “nervous breakdown” after “only” 7-weeks in jail.

Imagine her feelings, the excruciating torment, the emotional torture, the profound and crushing debasement, the inquisitorial cruelty, the powerlessness and desperation: chained like a wild beast or a feral male criminal,  a low-IQ savage and/or psychopath, big and fast and strong, violent and dangerous, and possibly deranged; shackled in handcuffs attacked to a waist-chain and leg-irons for over two hours for no exigent and practical reason, e.g., to prevent her from trying to escape and/or assaulting people, possibly causing serious injuries, and with two guards, a male and female, standing behind her, grim and vigilant, armed with guns and tasers. All unnecessary to protect anyone from anything. Gratuitous abuse and cruelty and degradation, pure and  simple.

In contrast, when sentenced to death for the car-jacking, abduction, “false imprisonment,” gang-rape, sadistic beatings, torture, mutilation, and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, Lemaricus Davidson was in street clothes and he wasn’t shackled  -although he was clearly a threat to assault the police and guards, possibly trying to wrest the gun from one of them, probably a female; and, if successful, people could have been shot or killed before he was shot and killed or wounded and incapacitated. Or he could have attacked the prosecutors,  the victim’s parents, his lawyers, even the judge, possibly causing serious injuries before he was overpowered, incapacitated, probably by the use of a taser and pepper spray, subdued and shackled.

Incredibly, this subhuman beast and monster was afforded and treated with far more dignity and respect than was Abigail at her sentencing for a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony, assuming she was guilty of such and lying about her “victim” raping and terrorizing her And so, too, were the other savages and monsters who were sentenced not to death but to decades in prison for one of the most sadistic, hideous, gruesome, sickening, horrific, ghastly, hellish, and “unspeakable” crimes in all of U.S. and world history.

And, in chains for over 2-hours, she was forced to hear the SVU detectives, prosecutors, various “experts,” CSA victimologists,” the “victim’s” mother, etc., demonize and vilify her as a monster and degenerate,  a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “child sexual abuser,” possibly even a “rapist” and “pedophile”; and her “victim,” a biological man of 15 who enjoyed the sex more than she did irrespective of the facts and whether or not he forced himself on her, defined and pitied as a “victim” of “rape” and CSA who is “traumatized” and “scarred for life,” a depiction of the crime and actors that  is not only false but execrably and ludicrously so.

She, not her “victim,” will be traumatized and scarred for life in fact as opposed to fantasy.

And the “victim’s” mother, vicious in her lust for vengeance, implored the judge to be “severe in his sentencing,” i.e., to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life. Obviously, she knew that the judge had no choice but to sentence Abigail to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. So to her, “only” 8-25 years in prison was too lenient for a woman who “used” a “child” for her “perverted desires” in a state and country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are repeatedly and systematically coddled. How crestfallen and outraged she must have been when the judge abjured her pleas and sentenced Abigail to “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. In a poll,, conducted by local media, over 10% of respondents thought her sentence was too indulgent! And roughly 30% thought it was just and rational and proportionate: a testament to the power and influence of the media and CSA victimology -and, to a lesser degree, MRAs.

8-25 years in prison for a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony; 8-25 years in prison for crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries; 8-25 years in prison for “crimes” in which the “victim” craves and enjoys the actus reus (i.e., the sex) far more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” him and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization”; 8-25 years in prison for transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship.

And that’s assuming she’s “guilty” and lying about his raping and terrorizing her. If her story is truthful, completely or essentially, in whole or in part, then she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison for “sexual assault” because her “victim” sexually assaulted her – as did the “victim” of Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, who testified in court and admitted to police that he sexually harassed, molested, and raped her; and the “victim” of Melissa Bittner,” transparently innocent of sexually molesting a 16-year-old predator and criminal who sexually molested her but convicted of “sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and 20-years of public sex-offender registration.

8-25 years in prison in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough” on violent crime, the average time-served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years. And these averages are even more execrable, appalling, and outrageous than they first appear, since one can reasonable assume that over 90% of such felonies were committed by violent recidivists, overwhelmingly males with histories of violence and predation usually beginning at age 13 or 14, and nearly all of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower today after 8-years of rule by Obama and Holder and Lynch and their advisors (including Al Sharpton) and appointees.

And she could have been sentenced to 25-years to life in prison for “crimes” that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries!

To call this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

Does Abigail Know that Feminism is Culpable, Seminally and Predominantly, for Destroying her Life?

Tags

feminism, innate sex differences, plea-bargain, women as rapists, women sex offenders

As noted previously, in a few posts, Abigail was prohibited from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the Huron Valley Correctional Facility. To the authorities, my words were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”

Did the left-feminist ideologues and totalitarians who rule the prison and the lives of inmates believe that Abigail would have gone berserk and attacked the guards and/or other inmates, perhaps inciting a riot or mass revolt, had she been allowed to read my heterodox and “politically-incorrect” arguments and contentions? Or simply that they would have vitiated the efficacy of her “sex-offender treatment”?

So, in effect, I’m a victim of censorship, denied the right to correspond with Abigail and ask her many questions about her intrigue with a 15-year-old student and biological man, her phantasmal and theoretical “victim” whom she claims forced himself on her three times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; her arrest, prosecution, trial, why she rejected the plea-bargains, her life in jail and prison; her life, especially as an adult, before it was shattered, forever and needlessly, by the criminal injustice system; her ideals, values, and opinions on various issues and subjects: e.g., what did she think of Mary Letourneau and her affair with a student and her sentence of 8-years in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration. What did she think of such laws and penalties, to the extent that she was aware of them, before they ruined her life?

Like most educated women, the overwhelming majority, alas,, I presume that Abigail is a left-liberal, probably more liberal than extreme/radical left, though I could be wrong. And, moreover, that she defines and thinks of herself as a feminist, however defined, broadly or narrowly, vaguely or precisely, accurately or inaccurately. If so, does she know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life.

In pre-feminist America, including the 1960s, the decade of  the “sexual revolution,” “statutory rape” laws didn’t even apply to women in most jurisdictions. And if they did so apply to women in some states or if women who had sex with young men under age 16 or 18 were guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, how many women were arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to jail or prison for such offenses? (Read my blog-post on Kirk Douglas) And how many were sentenced to 8-25 years in prison, like Abigail, or 6-15 years, like Kathryn Ronk, or enslaved for 8-years, like Mary Letourneau; or 40-years, like Shannon Schmeider, with a chance for parole after “only” 20 years; or life with a chance for parole after “only” 10-years, apparently, like Michelle Taylor; or 20-years with no chance for parole, like Brittany Zamora, and who knows how many other women, teachers and non-teachers, who received similar prison sentences. In pre-feminist America, was there even one woman who received such a draconian sentence for having a love affair or mere tryst with a biological man under age 18?

And even if incarcerated, none of them, upon their release, were subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet,” and registration for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, their mug-shots, names, and addresses on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

None of these laws and policies, these draconian/Orwellian punishments, inflicted on Abigail and myriads of other women for no exigent and practical reasons, would exist if not for feminism. Beginning in the early 1970s, in deference to feminism and the anti-rape movement which began, publicly and officially, in 1971 with the New York radical feminist rape conference, sex crime laws were revamped. State legislators, overwhelmingly male, enacted and imposed laws written by feminist lawyers.

De facto consensual sex between adults and young men and women under age 16 or 18, depending on the age of consent in each jurisdiction, was now a “gender-neutral” crime that applied equally to women and was equated or conflated under the law with violent-forcible rape and the rape and/or molestation of prepubescent children. And women were now defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships

Most infamously, Mary Letourneau was convicted of “child rape” under Washington law, and sentenced to almost a decade in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration, albeit she didn’t rape her “victim,” obviously, nor did she use violence/force or threats of same to compel his submission, nor was she guilty of molesting a prepubescent child. Her victim” was the aggressor and initiator who forced himself on her the first time they had intercourse. (Read my articles and blog-posts on her case for more details and analysis.)

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was convicted of “sexual assault of a child,” which implies that she was guilty of violence/force or threats of same in sexually abusing and violating a helpless and innocent  prepubescent boy, and sentenced to 4-years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration -when, in fact, she was the victim of abuse and her “victim” was the abuser and victimizer. He was not a child, biologically, but a man in size and sexuality, a delinquent and criminal of 15 who, as her student, constantly harassed and implored her for sex at school and in her classroom, molested and kissed her against her will, and finally raped her when she visited him at home on school business, apparently when no one else was present. She didn’t report the rape lest he “go to prison and become more of a delinquent.” Exploiting her altruism and compassion, not only misguided and foolish but ill-deserved and self-destructive, he manipulated and bullied her into having sex with him in an intrigue she didn’t know how to “end without hurting him,” resulting to her arrest and all that followed,

The real criminal, sexually and otherwise, was not punished, and who knows how many crimes he committed before he raped and molested Cassandra, and who knows how manyy crimes he’s committed thereafter. Did he rape any more women or adolescent girls, or even murder someone, like the “victim” of Melissa Bittner, who was convicted of
“sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and much else because she was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old delinquent. (See the posts on her case for more details.)

Ironically and paradoxically, such iniquities and outrages and travesties, inflicted even on women who were raped and molested by their de jure “victims” but still charged with and convicted of felony sex offenses, and the draconian-Orwellian sentences, are inconceivable apart from feminism and the anti-rape movement and CSA victimology.

CSA victimology and it’s tenets and dogmas and the resultant mass-hysteria, psychosis, moral panics, witch-hunts, and imprisonment and persecution of myriads of men and women who were/are either innocent or guilty of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, overwhelmingly first-offenders who, even if not innocent, were/are not violent and dangerous, people who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society or to anyone nor even a “danger to reoffend” by having sex with another biological man or woman under statutory age – this madness and reign of terror is inconceivable apart from feminist ideology and it’s decades-long jihad against sexual victimization, real and imagined.

Nor would adult women who have sex with young men under statutory age be absurdly defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” if not for feminism and the myth and premise that men and women and boys and girls are exactly the same apart from the inescapable differences in anatomy and the conflation of prepubescent boys and girls with pubescent male and female adolescents. And even the inescapable differences in anatomy and their relevance to and importance in sexual postures and possibilities are denied and trivialized as irrelevant and insignificant by feminists and other leftists and egalitarians (most fanatically, obsessively, and viciously by MRA, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement”) who define and vilify adult women as “rapists” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships  “sex-equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes,” to quote John Derbyshire, and the only crime in which the “victim” enjoys the actus reus (i.e. the sex) more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.” Nor would young men under age 16 or even 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women be defined as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who are “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

Abigail was convicted of “criminal sexual misdonduct,” a vague term, legally and empircally, under which all sorts of sex-acts that are now crimes, nearly always felonies, are subsumed: everything from violent-forcible rape, iinclding the most sadistic, brutal, vicious rapes and gang-rapes, truly “heinous” crimes that often also involve aggravated assault, kidnapping, “false imprisonment,” home invasions, torture, mutilation, and murder; to the molestation of prepubescent children; to factually consensual sex between adults and young men and women under statutory age, including women who are convicted of felonies for having sex with biological men under age 16 or 18 (or even 18-year-olds if the women is a teacher or tutor like Abigail and the “victim” is a student under her authority.

In contrast, legally and empirically, “statutory rape” is not a vaguely defined criminal offense. It defines, clearly and accurately, a specific and objective act. The modifying “statutory” denotes an absence of violent/force or threats of same to compel the submission of the “victim” -i.e., it reveals that the sex was consensual, factually as opposed to legally- while “rape” signifies the reality of penile-vaginal penetration, an act which only males can perpetrate. Thus even to define the women above as “statutory rapists” and their “crimes” as “statutory rape” is objectively and empirically false and thus absurd.

To repeat: Does Abigail know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life, culpable for her sentence of 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether she can never remove and public sex-offender registration. And so, too, now and in the past and future, he women above and far too many others whose lives have been and will be blighted or destroyed by modern feminism and CSA victimology.

 

Abigail Simon: Today, January 14, 2020, is the 5th Anniversary of her 8-25 Year Prison Sentence

Exactly 5-years ago, on Jan. 14, 2015, Abigail was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” that she can never remove and public sex-offender registration, with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification. January 13, 2020 was the end of her 5th year of enslavement, and January 14, 2020 was the start of her 6th year of enslavement. Given her 7-weeks in jail before her sentencing, she’s now been enslaved for 5-years and 7 weeks, 67 months, 267 weeks, and 1875 days of enslavement. and she’ll be enslaved for another 3-years, at least, if not longer. How many more years, months, weeks, and days of enslavement? 8-years, at least, with no privacy or freedom, never to leave the prison for even 12 hours unless a relative dies or is dying, and then she’ll attend the funeral or visit a hospital in the custody of two guards or police officers surely in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg irons on the trip from and back to the prison and likely also at the funeral or hospital visit.

The last best years of her life have been and will be spent in prison. She was enslaved, first in jail for 7-weeks and then in prison, at the end of her youth, broadly defined, and she’ll be released, probably after “only” 8-years at age 43,  but possibly after 10 or even 12 years at age 45 or 47, on the verge of or at the start of middle-age, usually defined as starting at age 45 and ending at age 65.

If, before her enslavement, she wanted to be a mother before it was too late biologically, it will almost surely be too late when she’s released from prison at age 43 or 45 or 47.

And given the misery and monotony, the abuse, emotional and physical(?), the dehumanization, threats and danger, fear and anxiety, despair and depression (probably including thoughts of suicide), the stultifying, oppressive, and dreary conformism, collectivism, and deprivation and denial of individuality (e.g., forced to wear the same uniform as the other 2000-plus inmates every waking hour of every day for at least 8-years), the hundreds of nights with little or no sleep, staring into darkness, and often crying I’m sure, the passage of time at a snail’s pace, it probably feels as if she’s been enslaved for a decade if not longer. And when or if she’s released after “only” 8 or 10 years, it will feel as if she’d been enslaved for 2 decades.

In July of 2016, the Detroit Free Press interviewed on erstwhile prison guard named Lauralie Herkiner, who finally quit after being forced to endure 16-hour a day shifts for 6-days a week because the prison can’t hire or retain enough women guards. She “described an over-crowded prison where drugs are widely available.” she also repined that “the guards are irritable and the inmates are irritable and it just builds. It’s unsafe. (“Ex-officer says women’s prison crowded, dangerous,” Detroit Free Press, 7-25-2016.) And I doubt that the conditions she described have improved since then or will improve during Abigail’s final years of enslavement. The over-crowding and dangers might even be worse now than they were in 2016 or 2015 when Abigail was first imprisoned.

And now she has to worry about the Chinese-Wuhan virus. The left has used the virus as a pretext to release myriads of violent and dangerous criminals from state and federal prisons, overwhelmingly black and Mestizo/Amerindian, and I’m sure that Michigan has released hundreds of violent and dangerous criminals, at least, because of the covid-19 pandemic, either  because they contacted the virus or to prevent them from being afflicted.

But not Abigail. I doubt that Abigail will be released from prison even if she’s afflicted with the Chinese-Wuhan virus. She’d be quarantined and treated in prison until she recovers and then returned to the general population.

And since the first inmate was afflicted on 3/27/2020, Abigail and all 2000-plus inmates are forced to wear masks every hour they’re awake and perhaps even at night while sleeping or lying awake in bed.

And in colleges and universities, government agencies and bureaucracies, state and federal, and even corporations, whites are subjected, mandatorily, to “critical race theory,” under which they’re browbeat, reviled, chastised, brainwashed, and humiliated by white-hating ideologues, fanatics  and inquisitors, black and white, compelled to apologize for and confess to the evil of “racism” even if they’re innocent or believe they’re innocent.

Are white inmates in state and federal prisons also subjected to this inquisitorial abuse and degradation? And if so, they can’t quit their jobs but can only escape this abuse and torment when released from prison.

And the hatred of white inmates by blacks is almost surely more intense now then at any time since she was first enslaved due to the death of George Floyd, from a drug-induce heart attack, and months of violence and destruction, riots and looting, anarchy and mayhem, the vilification and hatred of police and whites generally, and the harassment, threats, assaults, and murders.

And not a single person of any age in the state of Michigan has been or will be any safer because of her enslavement for 8-years, at least, followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian persecution. Not one violent or other mala in se crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian sentence -in a state in which, every year  in Detroit alone, nameless and faceless low-IQ brutes and savages who belong in prison (most of whom should have been buried in prison years ago) commit hundreds of rapes and murders and thousands of other violent and mala in se crimes.

And, thanks to the media, Abigail is more infamous and despised than all of these violent and/or recidivist criminal put together. And, most likely, she will serve more time in prison than 90% of those brutes and savages, predators and “sociopaths,” who are or have been or will be imprisoned. And, scandalously though not surprisingly, untold legions and armies of them are not even arrested, much less indicted, much less prosecuted, much less convicted, much less incarcerated.

I was born on Jan. 11, 1950. I was 65 when she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison 5-years ago. I’m now 70 and I’ll be 73, assuming I’m still alive, if she’s released from prison after “only” 8-years of enslavement, which is not a certainty. And 75 or 77 if she’s released after 10 or 12 years of imprisonment. It’s possible, if not likely, that I’ll die before she’s released from prison and that I’ll never have the chance to send her letters and articles and blog-posts and ask her many questions, at least some of which she’ll answer, hopefully, if her address is  on the public sex-offender registry. But even if I can write to her and ask questions,, it’s likely she won’t reply out of fear or by order of her parole officers.

As noted previously, more than once, she was prohibited, as was Kathryn Ronk, from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the prison because my words, iconoclastic and heterodox and “politically-incorrect,” were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”