Mary Letourneau’s Love Affair with Vili Faulau the 22nd most “Notorious” Crime of the Century!



On May, 2, 2009, I published an article at entitled “Mary Letourneau: Over a Decade of Lies, Hatred, Nonsense, Hysteria, and lunacy” which begins by noting that lists the “Crimes of the Century, the top 25: On the 75th anniversary of the Lindbergh kidnapping, TIME looks back at the notorious crimes of the past hundred years.”

Mary’s love affair with Vili Faulau ranks as number 22, not quite as “notorious” as the Lindbergh kidnapping, the abduction and murder of an infant by a monster who was summarily executed, the Black Dahlia, Richard Speck, Tate Murders, Son of Sam, John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, O.J. Simpson, the Unabomber, JonBenet Ramsey, Versace Killings, and a few others, but more “notorious” than Columbine and “The Scream” and myriads of other heinous crimes involving murder, mass murder, serial murder, terrorism, abductions, enslavement, violent rape, gang-rape, aggravated assault, maiming, torture, mutilation, and cannibalism not included in the “top 25.” A love affair between a teacher and her student that resulted in the births of two daughters and a marriage after her release from prison that has lasted over 10-years is equated with the most hideous, execrable, nauseating, and shocking barbarism, cruelty, sadism, brutality, depravity, and terrorism. Yes, according to, Mary love affair with Vili is more “notorious” than the 9/11 terrorist attack in which over 3,000 people were murdered.

And this in a country in which, during the last 50 years to say nothing of the last century, almost a million people have been murdered,  millions and millions of women and girls have been raped and gang-raped (and who knows how many men have been raped and gang-raped in prisons and jails?), and tens of millions of people of all races and both sexes have been the victims of not only rape and murder but aggravated assaults, shootings, muggings, armed robberies, car-jackings, abductions, home invasions, etc. Approximately 90-95% of such crimes have been committed by stereotypical criminals, overwhelmingly young males in their 20s and teens. And Mary is far more infamous and despised than all of these nameless and faceless criminals put together!!


The Mainstream Media is so Evil and Sick that Mary Letourneau and Abigail Simon are More Infamous and Despised than the Carr Brothers and Lemaricus Davidson and the Knoxville Savages


Unsurprisingly, doesn’t rank the Wichita massacre and Knoxville horror among the 25 “most notorious” crimes of the last century or even mention these gruesome and sickening atrocities. The MSM that has turned Mary Letourneau into the most infamous and hated woman sex criminal in all of American and world history has ignored and vigilantly suppressed. to as full an extent as is possible in a society that is still largely free, the horrific realities of the Wichita massacre and the Knoxville horror and myriads of other atrocities committed by similar monsters and subhuman beasts. Thus Mary Letourneau is far more infamous and despised than the Carr brothers and Lemaricus Davidson and the Knoxville savages, more infamous and despised than myriads of faceless and nameless violent and/or recidivist male criminals put together. And so too, to a lesser degree, is Abigail Simon

A Fellow Prisoner Remembers Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall as the “Nicest Person”


, , ,

Kathy O’L responds to the blog-post “Cassandra: guilty of ‘sexual assault’ because she was sexually assaulted” (quoted in part and edited for clarity):

I was unfortunately in the same punishment place in 1997. I personally was not aware of the allegations or what she was there for. BESIDES THE FACT SHE HAD BEEN THROUGH A HORRIBLE ORDEAL!! I do know for a fact that she was the nicest down to earth person if that’s what got her in trouble….Cassandra’s a strong kind bright woman. I remember everyday how she would break down about what she had lost and how people judged her and how she loved teaching!

Obviously, “Break down” means crying. So everyday, in the presence of this inmate and who knows how many other prisoners, she’d sob, perhaps at length, violently and uncontrollably. And, yes, being the “nicest person” who “loved teaching,” and her students, even a criminal and predator who sexually-harassed, molested, and raped her, is “what got her in trouble,” ironically the cause of her “horrible ordeal.”


Age and Male Behavior


Writes David T. Courtwright, under the sub-heading “Age and Male Behavior”:

Male behavior is most likely to be socially problematic in the late teens and twenties. This is the age range in which American men have been likeliest to kill or be killed, to set fires, filibuster, riot, vandalize, rob, and steal, and to abuse alcohol and other drugs. These are also the years in which reckless and intoxicated driving most frequently claim the lives of men. Young women die too, often a hapless passengers of negligent male drivers. (And also rape and gang-rape, M.K.)

The surest way to reduce crime, remarks the psychiatrist David T. Lykken, would be to put all able-bodied males between the age of twelve and twenty-eight into cryogenic sleep. He has a point. Though the medium age of arrest is subject to historic variation (it has gone down in the United Sates in the last century0, the arrest bulge invariably occurs in the teens and twenties and declines rapidly from the thirties on. (David T. Courtwright, “Violent Land,” p. 13.)

Lykken isn’t serious, of course. Putting high-IQ males ages 12-28 into “cryogenic sleep” would have disastrous consequences. But putting males ages 12-28 with IQ’s in the 70s and 30s and 90s would dramatically reduce the incidence of violence and criminality with few harmful consequences, especially as increasing numbers of menial jobs are performed by machines and robotics. And teachers, especially women, would be much safer. Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall and Melissa Bitter would not have been sexually-harassed, molested, and raped by criminals and biological men, age 15 and 16, and convicted of “sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and all the other draconian/Orwellian punishments. And few if any teachers, male and female, would be assaulted and murdered by male students.

Why do I Bother?


, , , ,

The primary reason I started this blog was to send Abigail letters and articles and posts on her case and those of other women, teachers and non-teachers, infamous and obscure, whose lives have been ruined, to varying degrees, by these insane and execrable laws, asking her many question, about her liaison with the football star, arrest, jailing, prosecution, rejection of plea-bargains, pretrial hearings, trial, conviction, sentencing, her life in jail and prison, and hoping she’d respond, as did Mary Letourneau, in many long letters, and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall in two short letters in which she answered a few questions, giving me some useful information, before saying she didn’t want to further discuss the matter. I was hoping she’d respond at length and also tell her family and friends, giving me their addresses so I could write them or correspond with them by email and ask them many questions about the travail, both of Abigail and themselves, and their opinions, emotions, etc.

A few weeks after sending her a letter and a few articles and blog-posts, I received a letter from the prison mail-room, a Michigan Department of Corrections’ “Notice of Package/Mail Rejection” with “threat to security, good order or discipline” highlighted in yellow as the reason for rejection.

So to the prison authorities, opposition to and criticism of  CSA victimology, the absurd premises and dogmas and the laws and policies they’ve engendered -e.g., ludicrously defining women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing  biological men under age 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships, and the young men who consent to or initiate sex with them as “victims” of rape and CSA who are “traumatized” and “scarred for life” and, consequently, the draconian/Orwellian punishments: sentences of months in jail or years in prison (in some cases even decades), mandatory “sex–offender treatment,” electronic parole-monitoring, quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, public sex-offender registration, all not only “cruel and unusual” but wholly gratuitous; and much else that was heterodox and “politically-incorrect- all this was a “threat to security, good order or discipline.”

And this message:

NOTE: A copy of this notice is being mailed to sender if rejected pursuant to PD 05.03.118 “Prisoner Mail.” The sender has 10 business days  to send any opposition to this proposed action to the facility head. The sender will be notified of the final decision…

I responded but received no response, I wasn’t “notified of the final decision” for whatever reasons. I was infuriated, dismayed, and also surprised that Abigail, unlike Mary and Cassandra, was prohibited from receiving and reading the letter and articles and blog-posts I sent her in the land of freedom of speech and the First Amendment.

So I’m a victim of censorship, not criminally, but in the sense of those with heterodox and “politically-incorrect” views on race and “gender,” academics and students who are censored and punished by universities, e.g., suspended without pay or even fired, expelled and vilified and rebuked and pilloried, for the sins of “racism” and “sexism,” xenophobia, “homophobia,” “Islamophobia,” etc., intellectuals and advocates who are not allowed to speak and express their views on colleges or in the mainstream media, and so forth. To the ruling-elites and governing-classes, not only the left and center but, on some matters, even the right, mainstream and “respectable,” their views are so toxic that the public, whether people watching TV or reading newspapers or students at universities, can’t be allowed to hear them lest they weaken the sacred and regnant myths and orthodoxies, just as Abigail can’t be allowed to read my views on her affair and punishment, arguments and contentions, no matter how logical and realistic and compelling, that are a “threat to security,” order, and discipline.

Does she even know that I and my blog exist. Do any of her family and friends know that I and my blog exist and, if so, have they read the articles and blog-posts, many or a few. If so, one would think that at least one of them would have sent me an email, however succinct, thanking me for writing on behalf of their daughter, sister, friend, acquaintance.

Why the Sexes don’t Understand Each Other, and How this Relates to Women having Sex with Young Men under Statutory Age


, , , , , ,

The fundamental reason men and women don’t understand each other is because they have different bodies. The only way men could understand female sexuality, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had female bodies. The only way that men could understand what it’s like to be a woman in respect to pregnancy, sexuality, hormones, menstruation, etc. is if they were female.

The only way that women could understand male sexuality, especially that of young males in their 20s and teens, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had penises and male levels of testosterone, which would make them male rather than female.

With the exception of “men’s rights activists” -pathological and vehement misogynists and thus the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise in factually consensual relationships0- women in general are more punitive and hysterical than men over affairs and trysts in which the “victims” almost always enjoy the sex far more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

The reason for this is not only that women as a group are more vitiated by feminist and CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation, but also because women don’t understand male sexuality, especially that of males in their 20’s and teens, including young men under age 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women. Their corruption by feminism and obsession with equality as sameness explains, paradoxically, why many if not most women, at least among educated women, are more angry over adult females, especially teachers in positions of authority, having sex with young men under statutory age than they are with adult men and even male teachers having sex with underage adolescent girls, and more punitive in their calls for retribution.

In respect to sex between adults and underage adolescents, this ignorance of male sexuality also explains why women in general are less likely to criticize and oppose and more likely to support the insanely and uniquely draconian/Orwellian laws and punishments, grotesque and gratuitous, “cruel and unusual,” imposed on adults who are at least 4-5 years older than their de jure “victims,” especially as they relate to women having sex with young men under statutory age.

It explains why women are more likely than men (save MRA’s and the likes of Barton Dieters) to view the young men as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who’ll be “traumatized and scarred for life” and the women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” who deserve to be sentenced to years or even decades in prison and subjected to mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet,” possibly for life as with Abigail Simon, and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of public registration on the internet as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of low-IQ brutes and savages who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women  and adolescent girls. Because of the media, primarily, untold millions of women hate Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and Abigail Simon more than all these low-IQ brutes and savages put together. whose crimes the media ignores and suppresses, with some exceptions.



Beyond Insanity: Woman teacher sentenced to 40-Years in prison for having sex with 14-year-old male student


, , , , ,

From (8/16/2013):

Teacher jailed for 40-years for sex with student age 14. From Daily Mail, 2-18- Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, will have to serve 20 years in the toughest sentence even handed out by a U.S. court to a teacher accused of underage sex, The Daily Mail reported (February 18, 2012).

And from (8/16/13):F

Female teacher Shannon Alicia Schmieder, in Coweta, Georgia received a 40-year jial sentence for sex with a 14-year-old boy. This fills some men’s rights proponents with glee: finally a woman gets a taste of the bitter “age of consent” medicine concocted by feminists and religious zealots: the same high jail terms men routinely get sentenced to. Making love carries the same prison term as murder or manslaughter.

40-years in prison, under a plea-bargain, apparently, and she won’t be eligible for parole until she’s been enslaved and abused and degraded for 20 years in  a chthonic Georgia prison -at least 20-years if not longer in a country in which, during the 1990’s, the average time-served for murder was less than 6=years and the average time-served for all violent felonies (aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and homicide) was approximately 4-years! And one can be sure that over-90% of these felonies, among the male offenders, were committed by recidivists, most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent felonies. And given their crime rates in relation to those of females, males are the beneficiaries, overwhelmingly, of this systemic leniency.

So it’s not true that men are “routinely” sentenced to 40-years in prison for having sex with pubescent teenagers under statutory age. It’s true that male teachers are often sentenced to 20 or 30 or 40 years in prison for having love affairs and mere trysts with underage female and male adolescents in a country in which violent male recidivist  criminals are routinely and systematically coddled.

But rather than decry and oppose the hideously draconian prison sentences often inflicted on male teachers and the draconian/Orwellian post-incarceration punishments inflicted on all male teachers -virtually all of whom are first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and usually victimless and mala prohibita felonies that are legal acts (or perhaps misdemeanors) in dozens of other nations, including European countries, men who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society” or usually even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another underage teenager- MRAs demand that the lives of women be destroyed by the same hideously draconian punishments.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance -against not only those they revile and asperse as “feminazis” but women in general and white females in particular, usually because of the actions of one or a few women in their personal lives, nearly always ex-wives, and/or sexual frustration- that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of men who are not violent or dangerous in order to destroy the lives of a much smaller number of women who transport biological men under age 16 or even 18 to carnal elysium with a distinctly venomous fixation on and obsession with teachers like Mary Letourneau and Debra Lafave.

Consummate and tireless practitioners of the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, MRAs cherry pick cases in which men are sentenced to 20-40 years in prison for having sex with underage adolescents, and contrast them with cases of women who receive probation or “only” 6-12 months in jail or 12-18 months in prison, thus advancing the lie and canard that men are nearly always sentenced to 20 or 30 or 40 years in prison while women are nearly always sentenced to probation or a few months in jails that are benign and liveable compared to male prisons, not because male inmates, generally, are far more violent, brutal, vicious, sadistic, predatory, etc., but because of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination. Men are crucified, almost invariably, their lives destroyed, while female “rapists,” “child molesters,” and “pedophiles” are shockingly and scandalously indulged, almost invariably, walking away with a “slap-on-the-wrist.”

Tell that to Shannon Schmieder, Michelle Taylor, Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk, Mary Letourneau, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, Pamela Rogers. and many other women who are punished more harshly than myriads of violent male recidivists. Even those who are sentenced to probation or “only” 6-12 months in hellish jails are  actually sentenced to a lifetime or at at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public registration (their names, mug-shots, and addresses on the internet for everyone and anyone to see) as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of male brutes and savages with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 who’ve committed dozens and scores of felonies but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have committed rapes and/or gang-rapes either of men in jails and prisons or of women and adolescent girls in the free world.



Beyond Insanity: 34-year-old Nevada woman sentenced to life in prison for allegedly “forcing” a 13-year-old male to touch her breast.


, , , , ,

“Does the Punishment Fit the Crime? ” So asks www. in a brief article:

An Elko County woman convicted of forcing a 13-year-old boy to touch her breasts was sentenced to life in prison. Michelle Lyn Taylor, 34, was convicted of lewdenss with a minor under 14 in November. Taylor’s attorney, public defender Alina Kilpatrick says it is the harshest sentence ever dealt to a female sex offender in Nevada. Kilpatrick  called the sentence unconstitutional. “This is cruel and unusual punishment,” Kilpatrick said. “She put his hand on her boob while she was wearing a bra, now she’s getting life.”

Elko County District Attorney Gary Woodbury said Taylor was “convicted of precisely what she did,” and under the state sentencing guidelines, life in prison was mandatory. Woodbury says Taylor did not want to negotiate a plea deal because she did not wanto to have to register as a sex offender. Woodbury says Taylor felt her life would be over if she had to register (as a sex offender) so it wouldn’t matter what she was she was convicted of.  Woodbury says while it might be some adolescent male’s fantasy to have sex with a woman, in this case it was a traumatic event. The child has needed and continues to receive therapy.

She was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted at trial in 2010. Apparently, she was so drunk that she didn’t even recall what occurred exactly. And, apparently, she was found guilty of this heinous crime solely on the “he said/she said uncorroborated testimony of a 13-year-old male. There with no physical evidence, obviously, or any neutral witnesses.

And, according to some accounts, the woman wanted to have sex with the young man. In the fantasy world inhabited by CSA victimologists, most of whom are women and nearly all of whom are feminists and left-liberals, and that of MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s rights movement,” and all those they’ve brainwashed, biological men under age 16 or 18 (and even “adults” of 18 if the woman is a teacher) are too innocent and paralyzed by fear to say “no” and reject the advances of a female who is an adult and at least 4-5 years older -albeit they are horrified and repulsed by the prospect of having sex with them even if they’re as ravishing as Debra Lafave or as lovely as Mary Letourneau. In this situation, obviously, a 13-year-old male was fully capable of saying “no” and resisting her advances and importunities, probably because she was fat, unattractive, and sloppy drunk.

And any “trauma” he suffered was a corollary of Nevada’s draconian sex-crime laws, the criminal justice system, the trial, and the media, not touching a woman’s breast in private, And how can a woman “force” a young man to touch her breast “against his will” if he’s bigger and stronger than her?

It would be interesting and revealing to know the average time-served in Nevada for males convicted of violent crimes: assaults, robbery, violent/forcible rape, and murder. And over 90% of the males who commit such felonies are recidivists, most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit violent felonies. And what is the average time-served in jail or prison for adult men who have liaisons with underage teenagers?

And are men guilty of a felony with a mandatory sentence of life in prison for forcing adolescent girls under age 14 to touch their chests while clothed? Men don’t have breasts, of course, but they have nipples. And women are guilty of felonies and described as “rapists” for engaging in coitus with biological men under statutory age even though they don’t have penises to penetrate and impregnate their “victims.”

Realism and Sanity from “the Derb”: “Sex Equality Dogma taken to Lunatic Extremes”


, , , , , , ,

Writes John Derbyshire:

O’Reilly implodes; Is Bill O’Reilly finally imploding? I am still a regular viewer of the Factor, but I find that more and more often I turn it off after ten minutes or so to do something more rewarding.

For one thing, there’s his bullying and grandstanding about child molesters. Now, I not a big fan of child molesters, having two kids of my own. The real monsters, though, are a minuscule minority of those who would be swept up by the kinds of laws O’Reilly is arguing for. Th majority would be harmless, clueless, sad types who had yielded to, or been led on to, the momentary of some petty fumbling, then been ready to commit suicide when they realized what they had done. People like that need to be chastised and set straight, but they don’t need the magnum sentences they’d get under Sandra’s law, or whatever the hell thing it is O’Reilly is bellowing for.

Even weirder is O’Reilly’s  conviction that the seduction of 14-year-old boys by pretty 25-year-old teachers is just as bad –precisely the same! deserves the identical sentence!- as the contrary thing with a 14-year-old girl and a 25-year-old male teacher. This is sex equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes, as I’ve argued in a previous diary. I’d expect this kind of junk jurispudence from some glaring feminist, but why am I getting it from O’Reilly? (

Actually, the view that the two acts are precisely the same and deserve the identical sentence informs the laws of all 50 states and has done so for decades and has long been espoused by virtually all of our ruling-elites and governing-classes, left and right and center: politicians, the media, SVU detectives, prosecutors, Judges, etc. What JD describes as “weird” is now a sacred and inviolate dogma, and for the elites and a plurality of people they’ve poisoned and propagandized, to confute this absurdity is comparable to denying the holocaust or defending slavery and segregation.

It should also be noted that in most of these intrigues, the woman isn’t even guilty of seduction. Either the “victim” is the aggressor and initiator or their sexual union could be described as a mutual coming together.

And though adult women allowing biological men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships is not “as bad” or precisely the same as adult men penetrating and often impregnating underage adolescent girls, I also oppose draconian and “magnum” sentences for adult men who have love affairs or mere dalliances with young women under statutory age if they are first-offenders with no history of violent or other mala in se criminality.

A Sane Comment: This Matter could have been Resolved Privately

To quote Liz DeRuchie:

The one thing I found very strange that I’ve never heard addressed, and should be, is why the boy’s mother went straight to police without discussing the matter with her son, and looking on his phone. I think the sentence and characterization of the participants was ludicrous but why would you put your son through a criminal investigation at the age of 16 or so….maybe that will be more damaging than the ill-conceived affair in the long run. Did his mom not talk to either her son or the teacher…Could this tragedy have been averted by early, adult intervention outside a criminal courtroom?

The answer is yes; This “tragedy” could have been “averted” without calling the police and destroying Abigail’s life and putting her son through the crucible and travail of a criminal investigation and prosecution.

Now if one’s daughter is brutally raped or one’s son is brutally assaulted by violent and dangerous criminals, whether they’re 15 or 25 or 35, parents have no choice but to call the police and subject their son or daughter to the ordeal of a criminal investigation and prosecution, including the ordeal of having them testify in court and endure the rigors of cross-examination by defense attorneys if the assailant pleads “not guilty.” In fact, they’re morally behooved to do so not only to ensure “justice” for their son or daughter but also to protect them and future victims by punishing and incarcerating violent and dangerous criminals. But such was not the case in this situation.

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that Abigail was and is lying about his raping and terrorizing her and that they were “madly n love” or, at least, engaged in a factually consensual and mutually gratifying relationship. Instead of calling the police, his mother and father could have confronted Abigail, at school or in her apartment, and told her that they’d call the police if she didn’t end the affair and that her life would be destroyed. And they could have told their son that they’d call the police if he didn’t end the affair and that Abigail’s life would be destroyed if they did so. Or they could have talked to both of them together, describing at length and in graphic detail the fate she would suffer if they didn’t end the affair.

I’m sure this would have ended the intrigue, at least until he turned 16, and nobody would have been hurt, profoundly and permanently, if at all if they weren’t “madly” and “deeply” in love but simply enjoyed having sex together  -not only Abigail, by far most hellishly, and her family and friends, whose anguish is harrowing, but also the “victim” and his family. “More damaging” than the affair “in “the long run.” Any suffering and pain he endured and will endure in the short and “long run” -suffering and pain that is real as opposed to imagined and contrived and exaggerated- is not a result of his having had sex with Abigail but wholly a result of the insane and execrable laws of Michigan, the criminal justice system, and the media. local, state, and national, especially the coverage of the trial and sentencing.

And if she’s lying and they were “madly” or just “deeply” in love, they could have resumed their affair when he turned 16 if she was no longer his tutor, since the generic age of consent is 16 in Michigan, and his parents could have done nothing, legally, to end it. To repeat: if he had been 16 rather than 15, just a few months and weeks older, and she had not been his tutor, their affair would have been legal under Michigan law. But since he was 15, just a few months and weeks short of his 16th birthday, and she was his tutor, she was guilty of a felony with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years and a life-sentence of public sex offender registration and electronic parole-monitoring with a ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can never remove.

To repeat once again; to call all his insane -particularly the arbitrary and irrational and hideously draconian laws- is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.