Abigail Simon: A life-Sentence of Draconian/Orwellian Persecution

Tags

registry, sex offender registry, sex offenders

But a sentence of 8-25 years in prison is not punishment enough for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts or possibly misdemeanors (?) in dozens of other nations, including European Countries. Nor is it protection enough for all the boys and girls of Michigan and the United States, including not only biological men under the legal age of consent such as her “victim’ but also young women under statutory age and prepubertal children of both sexes.

Given the decision of the Supreme Court of Michigan not to hear her final appeal, she’ll be enslaved for 8-years, at least, and perhaps longer. But if she doesn’t die in prison she’ll still be punished until the day she dies. When she’s released from prison after “only” 8 or 10 or 12 years(?), she’ll be subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian “supervision,” probably including “sex-offender treatment,” restrictions on her freedom and intrusions into her private life that not even dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have imagined and prophesized decades ago, most of which don’t apply to violent criminals on probation who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense, and registration for life as a uniquely vile and execrable and dangerous criminal -her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet for all to see in Michigan’s and national sex-offender registries- unlike myriads of brutes and savages who’ve committed many if not dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se felonies but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped and gang-raped men in prisons and jails and/or women and adolescent girls in the free world.

But not even all this is enough to punish Abigail and similar “convicted sex offenders,” and to protect all the children of Michigan and the United States (if allowed to move to or visits other states) from this uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal. And also adults, apparently. And thus her draconian and Orwellian sentence also includes a life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” that she can never remove.

To CSA victimologists and the ruling-elites and governing-classes they’ve successfully indoctrinated, most balefully and crucially those who enact and impose the laws and sentences and punishments (politicians, police, prosecutors, judges, etc.), and a media that controls the zeitgeist and public opinion, and tens of millions of people they’ve brainwashed, Abigail is viewed as such a danger to children  -from infants in their cradles to teenage criminals one day short of their 16th or 18th birthdays- that she must wear this tether or “bracelet,” as cumbersome as it’s conspicuous, 24-hours a day, in public and private: at work and play and leisure, when shopping, dining, walking the streets, sitting in a park, reading in a library, etc., and at home, waking and sleeping, having sex with a lover or spouse (assuming her parole agent permits this?), bathing, showering, etc.(Apparently, the device is waterproof so the tethered can’t be shocked when bathing or swimming.)

Shortly before her release from prison after 8 or 10 or 12 years, I assume the guards will strip her naked for the last time and then attach the tether to her bare ankle, probably with the assistance and under the supervision of a parole officer and/or SVU detective,  before she dresses in her own clothes and leaves the prison with family and/or friends.

She and myriads of other people whose one and only crime in life was having a liaison or tryst with a young man or women under statutory age can never remove this tether/ “bracelet.” Imagine the mortification, the embarrassment, the daily interaction with and responses and actions of other people for the rest of their lives or at least 20-30 years: e.g, for a woman at the beach, or a pool or gym or health club, or wearing shorts on warm days, or a dress or skirt at church or a wedding or party or restaurant, and so forth. The new-age scarlet letter.

And envision what if must be like having sex, for both the men and women who are tethered and their partners, lovers or spouses, whose ankles and feet and calves are bruised and even cut by the plastic during coitus or when lying in bed and sleeping, The constant discomfort, the itching, and also blisters, chafing, and rashes from a devise that must be worn 24-hours a day under all conditions. I assume the tether can be removed so cuts and rashes and blisters can be treated by a doctor, but only with the permission of and in the presence of a parole-officer and/or SVU detective.

If she lives to be 88 or 94 or 102, senile, blind or half-blind, confined to a wheelchair, living in a nursing home, or immobile and supine in a hospital bed, dying of cancer or simply old-age, even if unconscious, she must wear this tether until she dies and its removed by the authorities. And so, too, with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet in Michigan’s and national sex offender registries.. Only then will all the children of Michigan and all of America and the entire world be safe from this monster and degenerate.

So her life after prison -whether she dies in her 70s or 80s or 90s- will be worse in some ways than her life in prison. At least in prison she isn’t forced to wear an ankle-tether 24 hours a day and she can’t she receive hate-mail,  death threats, and obscene lust-letters with photos of male genitalia -the fate of many women on the public registry. And she can’t be raped and doesn’t have to worry about being raped because, as of now, male guards are not allowed in the housing units because of a scandal and lawsuit by hundreds of women who were raped by male guards at another prison that was closed shortly thereafter. And she can’t be murdered, tortured, or assaulted non-sexually, brutally, viciously, and sadistically, by male criminals, and doesn’t have to worry about same until she’s released from prison.

And, moreover, the second stage of her draconian/Orwellian sentence -if she’s released from prison after 8-years and if she dies in her 70s or 80s or even 90s or hundreds- will be 3 or 4 or even 5 or 6 times longer

All this for a women who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger” to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age -an infinitely remote possibility that no sane person would obsess over during the day or lose any sleep over at night. In reality as opposed to fantasy, not a single person in the state of Michigan, child and adult, has been or will be any safer because of the enslavement of Abigail Simon for at least 8-years followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian persecution. No violent or other serious crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian life-sentence. In respect to “protecting the public” and children and deterring and preventing violent and other serious criminality, her grotesque sentence is wholly gratuitous, “cruel and unusual” in the sense of being not only cruel but also totally unnecessary.

She’s enslaved, broken, degraded, immiserated, her life ruined, doomed until she dies, forever a victim of mass psychosis, hysteria, ignorance, fanaticism, “moral panic,” ideology, politics, and the resultant oppression, cruelty, iniquity,, and persecution. And for what? For nothing -for no exigent, rational,  imperative, and justifiable reason whatsoever- for those of us who are sane and just and honest and realistic.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity!

 

The Witch-Burning of Abigail Simon

Tags

Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, sex offender registry, women as rapists, women sex offenders

On Nov. 26, 2014, in Grand Rapids, MI, Abigail Simon (a former tutor at a Catholic high school) was convicted at trial of three counts of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a felony with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years, for allegedly having sex with a  male student who, according to her testimony in court and statements to SVU detectives and prosecutors when interrogated,  was not only the aggressor in their sexual intrigue but also forced himself on her 3 times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; and also the felony of “accosting a minor for immoral purposes” for exchanging hundreds of emails and text messages with her “victim,” a 6’3″, 220 lb. biological man of 15 and football star who initially confessed to authorities and also testified under oath at a pretrial hearing that Abigail’s version of what occurred was true but later recanted and claimed not only that he didn’t force himself on her but also that she was the initiator of their liaison and controlled the action and relationship. She told the authorities and testified in court that she responded to his hundreds of emails and text-messages to keep him away from her because she didn’t want to have sex with him and was afraid of him for the reasons above.

So what occurred, exactly? Who is telling the truth and who is lying? Only one of them or both to some degree? Only Abigail and her “victim,” nameless and faceless, know the answers, And I’m sure their memories, and interpretations of same, differ.

According to a man who believed her testimony and was thus sympathetic to Abigail, commenting on the internet after her conviction, he recanted and changed his story after being threatened with charges of rape by prosecutors who believed Abigail was “guilty” and wanted to prosecute her not only for “accosting a minor for immoral purposes,” a felony with a maximum-sentence of 4-years in prison and other mandatory punishments, but also “first-degree criminal sexual conduct.”

On Jan. 14, 2015, the judge was “merciful,” imposing the mandatory-minimum sentence of “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet and public sex-offender registration. He conceded that she was not a “predator” who was likely to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age much less commit violent and other mala in se crimes, and that her “victim” also knew that their intrigue was “wrong” and was thus “partly responsible,’ even if he didn’t rape her and “control her life” by threats and manipulation.  Thus he was not a CSA victimologist, fanatical and dogmatic, at her sentencing. (This would later change, as we’ll see, for whatever reasons.) But he had no choice, no “discretion” to impose a sane and “just” and  rational sentence that would blight but not destroy her life.

Even if he had such discretion, however, he probably would have sentenced her to 4-6 years in prison if not longer rather than “only” 6-12 months in jail or 1-2 years in prison, knowing the hysteria and outrage that such “leniency” would provoke not only in Grand Rapids and Michigan but nationwide: near universal condemnation, publicly and privately, indignation and rebukes and tirades from CSA victimologists, their votaries and voices in the mass media, and the tens of millions of people they’ve browbeat and/or brainwashed, including politicians, police, and prosecutors, judges and jurors. And also MRAs, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” and millions of people, overwhelmingly males of course but more females than one would expect, whom they’ve vitiated and duped to various degrees with their woman-hating vitriol and mendacity. And, probably, a fusillade and torrent of hate-mail, including death threats,, and perhaps even assaults and/or vandalism.

Under the law and to many if not most people, in fantasy as opposed to reality, she was so dangerous, such a “threat to society” and all the children of Michigan, that she couldn’t be released on bond but had to be enslaved in jail for almost two months before sentencing. At her sentencing, in a drab unisex denim jumpsuit, with no makeup, her medium-brown hair in a pony-tail with the blonde “highlights” faded, in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons for well over 2-hours, so debilitated and mortified by fear and shame (not for her “crimes,” but the chains, the crowd, the circus, the cameras, etc.) and despair and lack of sleep that she could barely walk or even stand and almost collapsed twice, she appeared to be on the verge of a “nervous breakdown” after “only” 7-weeks in jail.

Imagine her feelings, the excruciating torment, the emotional torture, the gratuitous degradation, the inquisitorial cruelty: chained like a wild beast or a feral male criminal,  big and fast and strong, violent and dangerous, and possibly deranged; shackled in handcuffs attacked to a waist-chain and leg-irons for over two hours for no exigent and practical reason, e.g., to prevent her from trying to escape and/or assaulting people, possibly causing serious injuries, and with two guards, a male and female, standing behind her, grim and vigilant, armed with guns and tasers.

In contrast, when sentenced to death for the car-jacking, abduction, “false imprisonment,” gang-rape, sadistic beatings, torture, mutilation, and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, Lemaricus Davidson was in street clothes and he wasn’t shackled  -although he was clearly a threat to assault the police and guards and prosecutors, or the victim’s parents, even the judge, possibly causing serious injuries before subdued and shackled; or to try to escape by running out of the courtroom and onto the street to do who knows what before subdued and captured by police. Incredibly, this subhuman beast and monster was afforded and treated with far more dignity and respect than was Abigail at her sentencing for a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony, assuming she was guilty of such and lying about her “victim” raping and terrorizing her And so, too, were the other savages and monsters who were sentenced not to death but to decades in prison for one of the most sadistic, hideous, sickening, horrific, and “unspeakable” crimes in all of U.S. and world history.

And, in chains for over 2-hours, she was forced to hear the SVU detectives, prosecutors, various “experts,” CSA victimologists,” the “victim’s” mother, etc., demonize and vilify her as a monster and degenerate,  a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “child sexual abuser,” possibly even a “rapist” and “pedophile”; and her “victim,” a biological man of 15 who enjoyed the sex more than she did irrespective of the facts and whether or not he forced himself on her, defined and pitied as a “victim” of “rape” and CSA who is “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life,” a depiction of the crime and actors that  is not only false but execrably and ludicrously so.

And the “victim’s” mother, vicious in her lust for vengeance, implored the judge to be “severe in his sentencing,” i.e., to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life. Obviously, she knew that the judge had no choice but to sentence Abigail to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. So to her, “only” 8-25 years in prison was too lenient for a woman who “used” a “child” for her “perverted desires” in a state and country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are repeatedly and systematically coddled. How crestfallen and outraged she must have been when the judge abjured her pleas and sentenced Abigail to “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. In a poll,, conducted by local Media, over 10% of respondents thought her sentence was too indulgent! And roughly 30% thought it was just and rational and proportionate: a testament to the power and influence of the media and CSA victimology -and, to a lesser degree, MRAs.

8-25 years in prison for a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony; 8-25 years in prison for crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including most European countries; 8-25 years in prison for “crimes” in which the “victim” craves and enjoys the actus reus (i.e., the sex) far more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” him and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization”; 8-25 years in prison for transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship.

And that’s assuming she’s “guilty” and lying about his raping and terrorizing her. If her story is truthful, completely or essentially, in whole or in part, then she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison for “sexual assault” because her “victim” sexually assaulted her – as did the “victim” of Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, who testified in court and admitted to police that he sexually harassed, molested, and raped her; and the “victim” of Melissa Bittner,” transparently innocent of sexually molesting a 16-year-old predator and criminal who sexually molested her but convicted of “sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and 20-years of public sex-offender registration.

8-25 years in prison in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough” on violent crime, the average time-served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years. And these averages are even more execrable, appalling, and outrageous than they first appear, since one can reasonable assume that 80-90% of such felonies were committed by violent recidivists, overwhelmingly males with histories of violence and predation usually beginning at age 13 or 14, and most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower today after 8-years of rule by Obama and Holder and Lynch and their advisors (including Al Sharpton) and appointees.

And she could have been sentenced to 25-years to life in prison for “crimes” that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries!

Does Abigail Know that Feminism is Culpable, Seminally and Predominantly, for Destroying her Life?

Tags

feminism, innate sex differences, plea-bargain, women as rapists, women sex offenders

As noted previously, in a few posts, Abigail was prohibited from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the Huron Valley Correctional Facility. To the authorities, my words were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”

Did the left-feminist ideologues and totalitarians who rule the prison and the lives of inmates believe that Abigail would have gone berserk and attacked the guards and/or other inmates, perhaps inciting a riot or mass revolt, had she been allowed to read my heterodox and “politically-incorrect” arguments and contentions. Or simply that they would have vitiated the efficacy of her “sex-offender treatment.”

So, in effect, I’m a victim of censorship, denied the right to correspond with Abigail and ask her many questions about her intrigue with a 15-year-old student and biological man, her phantasmal and theoretical “victim” whom she claims forced himself on her three times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; her arrest, prosecution, trial, why she rejected the plea-bargains, her life in jail and prison; her life, especially as an adult, before it was shattered, forever and needlessly, by the criminal injustice system; her ideals, values, and opinions on various issues and subjects: e.g., what did she think of Mary Letourneau and her affair with a student and her sentence of 8-years in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration. What did she think of such laws and penalties, to the extent that she was aware of them, before they ruined her life?

Like most educated women, the overwhelming majority, alas,, I presume that Abigail is a left-liberal, probably more liberal than extreme/radical left, though I could be wrong. And, moreover, that she defines and thinks of herself as a feminist, however defined, broadly or narrowly, vaguely or precisely, accurately or inaccurately. If so, does she know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life.

In pre-feminist America, including the 1960s, the decade of  the “sexual revolution,” “statutory rape” laws didn’t even apply to women in most jurisdictions. And if they did so apply to women in some states or if women who had sex with young men under age 16 or 18 were guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, how many women were arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to jail or prison for such offenses? (Read my blog-post on Kirk Douglas) And how many were sentenced to 8-25 years in prison, like Abigail, or 6-15 years, like Kathryn Ronk, or enslaved for 8-years, like Mary Letourneau; or 40-years, like Shannon Schmeider, with a chance for parole after “only” 20 years; or life with a chance for parole after “only” 10-years, apparently, like Michelle Taylor; or 20-years with no chance for parole, like Brittany Zamora, and who knows how many other women, teachers and non-teachers, who received similar prison sentences. In pre-feminist America, was there even one woman who received such a draconian sentence for having a love affair or mere tryst with a biological man under age 18?

And even if incarcerated, none of them, upon their release, were subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet,” and registration for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, their mug-shots, names, and addresses on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

None of these laws and policies, these draconian/Orwellian punishments, inflicted on Abigail and myriads of other women for no exigent and practical reasons, would exist if not for feminism. Beginning in the early 1970s, in deference to feminism and the anti-rape movement which began, publicly and officially, in 1971 with the New York radical feminist rape conference, sex crime laws were revamped. State legislators, overwhelmingly male, enacted and imposed laws written by feminist lawyers.

De facto consensual sex between adults and young men and women under age 16 or 18, depending on the age of consent in each jurisdiction, was now a “gender-neutral” crime that applied equally to women and was equated or conflated under the law with violent-forcible rape and the rape and/or molestation of prepubescent children. And women were now defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships

Most infamously, Mary Letourneau was convicted of “child rape” under Washington law, and sentenced to almost a decade in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration, albeit she didn’t rape her “victim,” obviously, nor did she use violence/force or threats of same to compel his submission, nor was she guilty of molesting a prepubescent child. Her victim” was the aggressor and initiator who forced himself on her the first time they had intercourse. (Read my articles and blog-posts on her case for more details and analysis.)

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was convicted of “sexual assault of a child,” which implies that she was guilty of violence/force or threats of same in sexually abusing and violating a helpless and innocent  prepubescent boy, and sentenced to 4-years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration -when, in fact, she was the victim of abuse and her “victim” was the abuser and victimizer. He was not a child, biologically, but a man in size and sexuality, a delinquent and criminal of 15 who, as her student, constantly harassed and implored her for sex at school and in her classroom, molested and kissed her against her will, and finally raped her when she visited him at home on school business, apparently when no one else was present. She didn’t report the rape lest he “go to prison and become more of a delinquent.” Exploiting her altruism and compassion, not only misguided and foolish but ill-deserved and self-destructive, he manipulated and bullied her into having sex with him in an intrigue she didn’t know how to “end without hurting him,” resulting to her arrest and all that followed,

The real criminal, sexually and otherwise, was not punished, and who knows how many crimes he committed before he raped and molested Cassandra, and who knows how manyy crimes he’s committed thereafter. Did he rape any more women or adolescent girls, or even murder someone, like the “victim” of Melissa Bittner, who was convicted of
“sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and much else because she was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old delinquent. (See the posts on her case for more details.)

Ironically and paradoxically, such iniquities and outrages and travesties, inflicted even on women who were raped and molested by their de jure “victims” but still charged with and convicted of felony sex offenses, and the draconian-Orwellian sentences, are inconceivable apart from feminism and the anti-rape movement and CSA victimology.

CSA victimology and it’s tenets and dogmas and the resultant mass-hysteria, psychosis, moral panics, witch-hunts, and imprisonment and persecution of myriads of men and women who were/are either innocent or guilty of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, overwhelmingly first-offenders who, even if not innocent, were/are not violent and dangerous, people who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society or to anyone nor even a “danger to reoffend” by having sex with another biological man or woman under statutory age – this madness and reign of terror is inconceivable apart from feminist ideology and it’s decades-long jihad against sexual victimization, real and imagined.

Nor would adult women who have sex with young men under statutory age be absurdly defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” if not for feminism and the myth and premise that men and women and boys and girls are exactly the same apart from the inescapable differences in anatomy and the conflation of prepubescent boys and girls with pubescent male and female adolescents. And even the inescapable differences in anatomy and their relevance to and importance in sexual postures and possibilities are denied and trivialized as irrelevant and insignificant by feminists and other leftists and egalitarians (most fanatically, obsessively, and viciously by MRA, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement”) who define and vilify adult women as “rapists” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships  “sex-equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes,” to quote John Derbyshire, and the only crime in which the “victim” enjoys the actus reus (i.e. the sex) more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.” Nor would young men under age 16 or even 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women be defined as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who are “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

Abigail was convicted of “criminal sexual misdonduct,” a vague term, legally and empircally, under which all sorts of sex-acts that are now crimes, nearly always felonies, are subsumed: everything from violent-forcible rape, iinclding the most sadistic, brutal, vicious rapes and gang-rapes, truly “heinous” crimes that often also involve aggravated assault, kidnapping, “false imprisonment,” home invasions, torture, mutilation, and murder; to the molestation of prepubescent children; to factually consensual sex between adults and young men and women under statutory age, including women who are convicted of felonies for having sex with biological men under age 16 or 18 (or even 18-year-olds if the women is a teacher or tutor like Abigail and the “victim” is a student under her authority.

In contrast, legally and empirically, “statutory rape” is not a vaguely defined criminal offense. It defines, clearly and accurately, a specific and objective act. The modifying “statutory” denotes an absence of violent/force or threats of same to compel the submission of the “victim” -i.e., it reveals that the sex was consensual, factually as opposed to legally- while “rape” signifies the reality of penile-vaginal penetration, an act which only males can perpetrate. Thus even to define the women above as “statutory rapists” and their “crimes” as “statutory rape” is objectively and empirically false and thus absurd.

To repeat: Does Abigail know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life, culpable for her sentence of 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether she can never remove and public sex-offender registration. And so, too, now and in the past and future, he women above and far too many others whose lives have been and will be blighted or destroyed by modern feminism and CSA victimology.

 

Abigail Simon: Today, January 14, 2020, is the 5th Anniversary of her 8-25 Year Prison Sentence

Exactly 5-years ago, on Jan. 14, 2015, Abigail was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” that she can never remove and public sex-offender registration, with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification. January 13, 2020 was the end of her 5th year of enslavement, and January 14, 2020 was the start of her 6th year of enslavement. Given her 7-weeks in jail before her sentencing, she’s now been enslaved for 5-years and 7 weeks, 67 months, 267 weeks, and 1875 days of enslavement. and she’ll be enslaved for another 3-years, at least, if not longer. How many more years, months, weeks, and days of enslavement? 8-years, at least, with no privacy or freedom, never to leave the prison for even 12 hours unless a relative dies or is dying, and then she’ll attend the funeral or visit a hospital in the custody of two guards or police officers surely in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg irons on the trip from and back to the prison and likely also at the funeral or hospital visit.

The last best years of her life have been and will be spent in prison. She was enslaved at the end of her youth, broadly defined, and she’ll be released, probably after 8-years but possibly 10-12, at age 43-47, on the verge of or at the start of middle-age.

And given the misery and monotony, the abuse, emotional and physical(?), the dehumanization, threats and danger, fear and anxiety, despair and depression (probably including thoughts of suicide), the stultifying, oppressive, dreary conformism and collectivism,  the hundreds of nights with little or no sleep, staring into darkness, and often crying I’m sure, the passage of time at a snail’s pace, it probably feels as if she’s been enslaved for a decade if not longer. And when or if she’s released after “only” 8 or 10 years, it will feel as if she’d been enslaved for 2 decades.

In July of 2016, the Detroit Free Press interviewed on erstwhile prison guard named Lauralie Herkiner, who finally quit after being forced to endure 16-hour a day shifts for 6-days a week because the prison can’t hire or retain enough women guards. She “described an over-crowded prison where drugs are widely available.” she also repined that “the guards are irritable and the inmates are irritable and it just builds. It’s unsafe. (“Ex-officer says women’s prison crowded, dangerous,” Detroit Free Press, 7-25-2016.) And I doubt that the conditions she described have improved since then or will improve during Abigail’s final years of enslavement. The over-crowding and dangers might even be worse now than they were in 2016.

And now she has to worry about the Chinese-Wuhan virus. The left has used the virus as a pretext to release myriads of violent and dangerous criminals from state and federal prisons. And I’m sure the Michigan has released hundreds of violent and dangerous criminals, at least, because of the covid-19 pandemic -but not Abigail. I doubt that Abigail will be released from prison even if she’s afflicted with the Chinese-Wuhan virus.

And not a single person of any age in the state of Michigan has been or will be any safer because of her enslavement for 8-years, at least, followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian persecution. Not one violent or other mala in se crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian sentence -in a state in which, every year  in Detroit alone, nameless and faceless low-IQ brutes and savages who belong in prison (most of whom should have been buried in prison years ago) commit hundreds of rapes and murders and thousands of other violent and mala in se crimes. And, thanks to the media, Abigail is more infamous and despised than all of them put together. And, most likely, she will serve more time in prison than 90% of those brutes and savages, predators and “sociopaths,” who are or have been or will be imprisoned. And, scandalously though not surprisingly, untold legions and armies of them are not even arrested, much less indicted, much less prosecuted, much less convicted, much less incarcerated.

I was born on Jan. 11, 1950. I was 65 when she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison 5-years ago. I’m now 70 and I’ll be 73, assuming I’m still alive, if she’s released from prison after “only” 8-years of enslavement, which is not a certainty. And 75 or 77 if she’s released after 10 or 12 years of imprisonment. It’s possible, if not likely, that I’ll die before she’s released from prison and that I’ll never have the chance to send her letters and articles and blog-posts and ask her many questions, at least some of which she’ll answer, hopefully but, alas, probably not. As noted previously, more than once, she was prohibited, as was Kathryn Ronk, from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the prison because my words, iconoclastic and heterodox and “politically-incorrect,” were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”

Jeffrey Epstein was not a Pedophile

Google searches for “Jeffrey Epstein, pedophile,” and “Jeffrey Epstein is a pedophile,” resulted in 1.1 million and 1.4 million results. And when reading the titles of dozens of these results, I found only one article that observed, correctly, that Epstein was not a pedophile, and explained why in some detail: “Jeffrey Epstein is a horrifying person, but that doesn’t mean he’s a pedophile,” Katie Herzog, The Stranger, 7-15-2019.

(I submit that calling Epstein and his crimes “horrifying” is just a bit excessive and hyperbolic -compared to the horrors and atrocities of the Carr Brothers and the Knoxville savages, for example, and myriads of other crimes almost no one has ever heard of because of media suppression.)

And I’m certain that nearly all of the “talking heads,” reporters and commentators, hosts and guests, on Fox and CNN and MSNBC, when discussing the Epstein case, referred to him as a “pedophile,” and I doubt that even one of them noted that he was not a pedophile. And so, too, hundreds of other TV programs, news and commentary, newspapers, local and national, and websites, prominent and obscure.

Even John Derbyshire, who once knew better, not long ago, but does no longer, apparently, referred to Epstein as a “pedophile.”

Whatever one thinks of Jeffrey Epstein and his decades of having sex with young women ages 14-17, apparently, he was not a pedophile. To quote /Wikipedia; “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 or younger.”

And Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield:

….The DSM-TV American Psychiatric Association defines pedophilia in terms of recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children…It is therefore possible for an individual who meets these criteria to have never engaged in illegal sexual behaviors…All mental health professionals…should know this distinction. (“Special Problems with Sexual Abuse Cases,” in Coping with psychiatric and Psychological Testimony, Los Angeles Law and Psychological Press, 1995, p. 1336.)

Politicians, prosecutors, judges, journalists, reporters, commentators, all those with the power and influence, collectively and individually, to manipulate the emotions and shape the opinions of millions or even tens of millions of people, should also know this instead of provoking and misleading the public by defining adults who have sex with biological men and women under age 16 or even 18 as “pedophiles,” whether it’s Jeffrey Epstein or Abigail Simon and Mary Letourneau.

Pedophilia defines sexual desire, not criminal behavior. It’s reasonable to assume that most pedophiles, heterosexual and homosexual, have never raped or molested a prepubescent child. Thus if sexual attraction to young men and women under age 16 or even 18 is “pedophilia,” which is isn’t, then all men, heterosexual and homosexual, are pedophiles, which they are not.

Then all adult men who are attracted to young women under statutory age are “pedophiles,” just like Epstein, even if they’ve never had sex as adults with a young woman under statutory age. If Epstein was a “pedophile” for having sex with young women ages 14-17, then all adult men who desire to have sex with young women under age 18 but don’t have sex with them are “pedophiles,” but only if they’re 4-5 years older than the young women to which they’re sexually attracted, according to CSA victimologists.

Moreover, albeit the U.S. is sui generis in its hysteria over sex between adult men and women and male and female adolescents, as exemplified by the obsession with and hysteria over Epstein and his “pedophile ring” and “island/kingdom,” the generic age of consent is 16 in most jurisdictions. (Thus many or at least some of his sex-acts with girls of 16 and 17 were legal acts.) And the age of consent is 14 or 15 in dozens of other nations, including European countries.

If adult men and women having sex with young men and women ages 16 and 17 is pedophilia, but only if the adults are at least 4-5 years older than their de jure “victims,” then pedophiliac sex is legal in most states if the adult is not in a position of authority over their “victims.” And if sex between adults and young men and women ages 14 and 15 is “pedophilia,” then pedophiliac sex is legal in many other countries.

A pedophile is a man (including “older adolescents,” as noted by Wikipedia.com) with a sexual fixation on and obsession with prepubescent girls or boys. Even if women have sexual contact with prepubescent children, they aren’t necessarily pedophiles. In fact, it’s debatable if a woman can even be a pedophile under the APA definition, certainly not in the sense and to the degree that males are pedophiles, for the same reason that few if any women are fetishists, and certainly not in the male sense. To quote Ernest Becker:

This brings up the longstanding problem of why so few females are fetishists, a problem that has been solved by Greenacre and Boss. Their point is that the male, in order to fulfill his species role, has to perform the sexual act. For this he needs secure self-powers and also cues to arouse and channelize his desires. In this sense, the male is naturally and inevitably a fetishist of some kind and degree…The female does not have this problem because her role is passive…(The Denial of Death, p. 243.) Put differently, and simply, men have penises and women vaginas.

Albeit not a pedophile, Epstein was obviously a strange and profoundly disturbed man -not so much because he had sex with dozens of young women ages 14-17 but because, after he was arrested, prosecuted, convicted under a plea-bargain, and sentenced to 13 months in jail with work-release privileges, he continued to have sex with young women under statutory age, knowing that is was ineluctable, a virtual 100% certainty, that he’d be arrested and prosecuted again.

And this time, also ineluctably, the prosecutors would not have offered him so indulgent a plea-bargain and he would have pled “not guilty” and gone to trial and almost surely been convicted of who knows how many felonies. And as a repeat offender, his sentence would have been so harsh and long that he would have died in prison even if he lived into his 80s, assuming he wasn’t murdered, well before he turned 70, strangled or beaten to death as are many sex offenders, especially those convicted, innocent or guilty, of crimes against children, including teenagers.

And that’s what occurred, probably, strangled to death by another inmate with the collusion, active or passive, of the guards, shortly after he was incarcerated, assuming he didn’t commit suicide. Such outrages are a prison tradition, preventable but condoned and often facilitated and encouraged by the authorities. Men convicted of sex crimes against children and adolescents, innocent or guilty, are the most hated of all inmates and by far the most likely to be murdered.

(“No woman convicted of a sex crime has ever been killed, but they’ve been beaten, usually under the guise of another dispute,” to quote an article in NASOL, 8-13-2019. So the chances of Abigail and similar women being murdered in prison are remote since no woman convicted of a sex crime against children or teenagers has ever been murdered in jail or prison, though it’s not impossible, but not so with their being assaulted, perhaps brutally and viciously and resulting in serious injuries. And Abigail is the most infamous, and probably the most despised, of all 2000-plus inmates, and thus more likely to be assaulted than most of the other inmates in security level II.)

In stark contrast, there has never been and will never be a female Jeffrey Epstein. Not only has no women ever had sex with dozens or likely even a few young men under age 16 or 18 -but also, unlike Epstein, it’s likely that not one woman sentenced to jail or prison for having sex with a young man under statutory age has re-offended by having sex with another young man under statutory age. If so, their recidivism rate is ZERO, as noted previously.

Ominously, despite such realities, what frightens and disturbs me the most about the obsession with and hysteria over Epstein and his excoriation and vilification as a “pedophile” is that it will surely confirm and justify and probably intensify the obsession with and hysteria over adult women and especially teachers having sex with biological men under statutory age and their excoriation and vilification as “rapists” and “pedophiles” and the resultant draconian/Orwellian punishments.

Currently, in the MSM, Epstein has superseded Mary Letourneau as the most infamous and opprobrious sex criminal. But how long with that last, for prior to Epstein and after the obsession with and mass hysteria over the “priestly pedophilia crisis,” which was the first time that adult were defined, falsely, as “pedophiles” for having sex with pubescent teenagers, the media and culture was far more obsessed with and hysterical over women teachers having sex with male students than with male teachers and other adult men, including violent and/or recidivist criminals, having sex with underage adolescent girls. And Mary was the symbol and avatar of that obsession and mass hysteria, as was Abigail Simon, to a lesser degree, almost 20 years later.

Because of Epstein, I fear, adult women and especially teachers who have sex with young men under statutory age (and it’s now a felony in most states for teachers to have sex with 18-year-old students) will be more rather than less likely to receive hideously draconian/Orwellian sentences. There will be more rather than fewer Abigails, Kathryn Ronks, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohalls, Shannon Schmeiders, Michelle Taylors, Melissa Bittners, Brittany Zamoras, etc.

Beyond Insanity: Brittany Zamora, a former Arizona teacher, sentenced to 20-years in prison for having sex with a 13-year-old male student

Mary Letourneau, Pamela Rogers, Cassandra Soorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk Shannon Schmeider, Michelle Taylor, and who knows how many others of whom I’m unaware, prosecutions almost or just as or even more insane, execrable, appalling, grotesque, sentences almost or just as or even more iniquitous,  irrational, gratuitous, draconian, Orwellian.

And now Brittany Zamora, a former Arizona teacher, a nonviolent first-offender in her 20s who was recently married, was just sentenced to 20-years in prison, under a pleas-bargain, for having sex with a 13-year male student. And she must serve the full sentence; there’s no parole or release for “good behavior,” or to alleviate the problems and miseries of hellish overcrowding, after 5 or 10 or even 15 years.

She should have murdered someone. If so, especially if convicted of second- or third-degree murder, she’d serve less time in prison, almost surely, if not far less time, most likely; and she wouldn’t have to register for life as a uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

20-years in prison and then 30 or 40 or 50 years of quasi-totalitarian persecution, if she dies in her 70’s or 80’s or 90’s, for a woman and newlywed who never committed a violent felony in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone  nor even a “danger to re-offend” by having sex with another biological man under statutory age.

Willie and Abigail: Fact and Fiction

Tags

"anarcho-tyranny", registry, sex offenders, Willie Horton

Interviewed by The Nation, sympathetically and compassionately, Willie repined:

The fact is, my name isn’t “Willie.” It’s part of the myth of the case. The name irks me. It was created to play on racial stereotypes -big, ugly, dumb, violent, black- “Willie,” I resent that. They created a fictional character -who seemed believable, but who did not exist. They stripped me of my identity, distorted the facts, and robbed me of my constitutional rights.”

Yes, I’m sure no one has ever called him “Willie” -not his friends and classmates when he was a child and adolescent, nor his relatives, nor his acquaintances, including his criminal accomplices and fellow jail and prison inmates. I’m sure all address and have addressed him as “William” and usually as Mr. William R. Horton or Sir William R. Horton. The only times and places he’s ever been addressed as William Horton or Mister Horton and so forth is in court during his trials, pretrial hearings,and at sentencing, and in appeals and court documents, and on the news and in articles and interviews.

And, no, he’s not “big, ugly, dumb, violent,” nor even “black.” He’s tiny and frail, stunningly handsome, extremely intelligent, utterly non-violent, supremely civilized, and he’s  not even black or “African-American,” apparently, despite his appearance. And he didn’t stab a gas-station attendant 19 times during a robbery and then stuff his body in a garbage can where he bled to death. And when on furlough, in June of 1986, he didn’t fail to return to prison but fled to Maryland where, in April 1987, he “twice raped a woman after pistol-whipping, knifing, binding, and gagging her fiance,” torturing him for 7 hours, and then stole his car until he was shot and captured and sentenced to prison for life with no chance for parole and no furloughs. None of this happened, nor did any of the other violent and mala in se felonies and misdemeanors he surely committed, dozens I’m sure for which he wasn’t imprisoned, jailed, convicted, or even arrested and prosecuted, beginning at age 14 or 15 or even 13 or 12. All this is a “myth,” pure fiction, a distortion of the facts and his true identity and character.

He’s not only a low-IQ brute, savage, monster, and degenerate -he’s also a liar, as blatant as he’s shameless, and/or a psychotic, as are most black criminals. And the Nation treated him with dignity and respect and gave him a chance to lie about his crimes and whine about the denial of his “constitutional rights,” whatever that means exactly. He was also interviewed, no doubt credulously and sympathetically, in Playboy. And, obviously, the leftists at The Nation edited the interview to make this savage and monster appear intelligent, articulate, sympathetic, etc., and put “words in his mouth” so to speak. Did they actually believe all or any of his lies and actually believe he was completely innocent, of any or all of his crimes, a “fictional” monster created by Republicans to win a presidential election. The media turned him into a celebrity, and a victim of “racism” and “stereotypes,” worthy of compassion.

In contrast, the portrayal of Abigail by the media and criminal justice system -her vilification as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” a “predator” and monster who is a “threat to society” and to all the children of Michigan, so dangerous that she must be enslaved for 8-years, at least, and then subjected to a life-sentence of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether and public registration as a uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminal, and the depiction of the young man who consented to or initiated sex with her and might have forced himself on her as a “victim” of CSA and “sexual assault” who’s “traumatized” and “scarred for life- all this is pure fiction.

 

 

Beyond Insanity: Massachusetts in the 1970s and 80s and Michigan Today, Willie Horton and Abigail Simon

Tags

Willie Horton

To quote Wikipedia under the title “Willie Horton”:

William R. Horton (born August 12, 1951) is an American convicted felon who, while serving a life sentence for murder (without the possibility of parole), was the beneficiary of a Massachusetts weekend furlough program. He did not return from the furlough and, ultimately, committed assault, armed robbery, and rape before being captured and sentenced in Maryland where he remains incarcerated. The controversy over Horton’s furlough became a major issue in the 1988 presidential campaign.

On October 26, 1974, in Lawrence, Massachusetts, Horton and two accomplices robbed Joseph Fournier, a 17-year-old gas station attendant, and then fatally stabbed him 19 times after he had cooperated by handing over all of the money in the cash register. His body was stuffed in a trash can so his feet were jammed up against his chin. Fournier died from blood loss. Horton was convicted of murder, sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and incarcerated at the Northeastern Correctional Center in Massachusetts.

On June 6, 1986, he was released as part of a weekend furlough program but did not return. On April 3, 1987, in Oxon Hill, Maryland, Horton twice raped a woman after pistol-whipping, knifing, binding, and gagging her fiance. He then stole the car belonging to the man he had assaulted. He was later shot by Corporal Paul J. Lopez of the Prince George’s County Police Department and captured by Corporal Yusaf A. Muhammad….after a pursuit. On October 20, Horton was sentenced in Maryland to two consecutive life terms plus 85 years. The sentencing Judge, Vincent J. Femia, refused to return Horton to Massachusetts, saying, “I’m not prepared to take the chance that Mr. Horton might again be furloughed or otherwise released. This man should never draw a breath of free air again.

So, incredibly, he was free from June 6, 1986, when released for a weekend furlough, until April of 1987, totally free for almost a year without being captured, until he committed aggravated assault, rape, and car theft in Maryland and was shot and captured by police and ultimately imprisoned for life with no chance of being furloughed or otherwise released. I wonder how many other crimes he committed, and who knows what else, during his almost year-long furlough?

Wikipedia doesn’t mention that Horton, unlike Abigail Simon, who must wear an ankle-tether 24-hours a day for the rest of her life, until she dies in her 70s or 80s or 90s or 100s, was not subjected to electronic parole-monitoring during his weekend furloughs. So every year, this monster, convicted of armed robbery and first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole, was completely free and unsupervised for over 100 days a year and for over 300 days from June 6 of 1986 until April of 1987 when shot and captured by police and incarcerated in Maryland.

He could have raped and murdered 10-20 women during his almost year-long furlough and, since Massachusetts didn’t have the death penalty, he would not have been punished for these atrocities and perhaps dozens of other violent and mala in se felonies -and perhaps, given the lunacy of Dukasis and other left-liberals, might have even been given furloughs, completely free once again on weekends to commit even more rapes and murders and other crimes with no fear or possibility of additional punishment.

To quote Wikipedia under the headline “legislative and political background”:

Democratic Presidential candidate Michael Dukasis was the governor of Massachusetts at the time of Horton’s release and while he did not create the furlough program, he had supported it as a method of criminal rehabilitation. The state inmate furlough program, originally signed into law by Republican Governor Francis Sargent in 1972, excluded convicted first-degree murderers. However, 1973, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that this right extended to first-degree murderers, because the law specifically did not exclude them. The Massachusetts legislature quickly passed a bill prohibiting furloughs for such inmates. However, in 1976, Dukasis vetoed this bill arguing it would “cut the heart out of efforts at inmate rehabilitation.”

The program remained in effect through the intervening term of Governor Edward J. King, and was abolished during Dukasis’ final term of office on April 28, 1988, after Dukasis had decided to run for President. This abolition occurred only after the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune had run 175 stories about the furlough program and won a Pulitzer Prize.

Unlike Willie Horton and myriads of other violent and dangerous criminals who were furloughed on weekends in Massachusetts and who knows how many other “progressive” states during the 1970s and 80s with no supervision or electronic parole monitoring -the overwhelming majority of them low-IQ brutes and savages with histories of violence and criminality beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 and who, with almost no exceptions, committed dozens and scores of violent and mala in se crimes, including first-degree murders, for some even hundreds, including who knows how many while on furlough- Abigail Simon, during her 8-years of enslavement, at least, will not be granted even one weekend furlough, even though she has never committed a violence or mala in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

Her only chance to be released from prison for even a day or several hours is for the funeral or “sick bed visit” of an “immediate family member.” To quote the “Office of Legislative Corrections Ombudsman” under the heading “Funeral and Sick Bed visits”:

The following is based on Michigan Department of Corrections Policy Directive 04.04.140 “Funeral and Sick Bed Visits” The Warden may permit a prisoner to leave the facility under escort for the following reasons: 1. to visit a critically ill immediate family member in a hospital or medical car facility; or 2. to attend the private funeral of an immediate family member. Approval for sick bed and funeral visits is at the discretion of the warden. the warden is not required to to approve such visits.

So Abigail’s only chance of being released from prison for a maximum of 12 or 24 hours, on approval of the authorities, if a visit is over 500 miles round-trip, is if an ‘immediate family member” dies or is dying and the warden has the discretion not ‘to approve such visits.” And she must be “escorted” by off-duty correction officers not related to her by blood or marriage.

And I’m sure she’ll be chained like an animal or a feral male criminal, fast and strong and violent and dangerous, in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons during the entire 12 or 24 hours, certainly during the ride to the funeral or “sick bed visit” and back to the prison and likely also during the funeral or “sick bed visit” with the prison guards nearby to vigilantly protect the mourners and others present from a deviant and dangerous “sex-offender.” And will she also be required to wear an ankle-tether/”bracelet” -lest she escape, miraculously, and threaten all the children of Michigan from infants in their cradles to teenage criminals one day short of their 16th birthdays, and those of other states to which she may flee like Willie Horton.

So if one of her closest friends is raped and murdered by one or more of Michigan’s far-to-many Willie Horton-like criminals, Abigail won’t be allowed to leave prison for 12 hours to attend her funeral. And she could not leave the prison for even a few hours -her arms and legs in chains and wearing an ankle-tether and under the control and supervision of two armed correction officers- to attend her sisters wedding.

 

Reality vs. Fantasy

Tags

"traumatization", innate sex differences, women sex offenders

Joseph Epstein on the generic nature of teenage males:

I have a special regard for studies that tell us that the way to reform calls for changing human nature. This study, apparently, also demonstrates that there is probably no such thing as a bad bully, that behind every bully is a lonely, confused boy, frequently ill-adjusted….Boys, surely by now everyone knows, are brutes. Between the ages of 12 and 18, no matter what their other achievements, they are chiefly interested in sex and talk about sex, in devouring large quantities of unhealthy food, and in playing games at which they can outwit, triumph over, and otherwise humiliate their fellows. Boys exist in a near Hobbesian state of nature. Modern life isn’t, thank goodness, nasty, brutish, and short. But boys, given free rein, would make it so. (“B is for Boy -and Bullies,” WSJ, 4-30-2000)

Generally, this is true, but with many exceptions, of course, including myself, in regard to bullying. And I was not a brute nor are myriads of other males ages 12-18. And males in their 20s are just as “interested in” and obsessed with sex both in their fantasies and in practice, especially as adults from age 18 on and often as adolescent “minors,” an interest and obsession that last into their 30s and 40s and 50s and 60s and beyond with the aid of Viagra and similar drugs.

And in regard to brutes and bullies, most of what he says is just as true of most males in their 20s and many who are older and brutes and bullies even in their 40s and 50s and 60s and beyond, e.g, military officers and jail and prison guards and police and coaches and bosses and fathers.

And a large minority of males are not only bullies and brutes but low-IQ savages and predators and psychopaths, violent and recidivist criminal who commit aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, burglaries, acts of vandalism, home invasions, torture, rape, gang-rape, murder, etc., especially as teenagers, or even younger, beginning at puberty, and in their 20s.

And not “everyone” knows that boys are “brutes” by nature. Not the authors of the study he mentions and not CSA victimologists, obviously, and virtually all feminists and left-liberals/”progressives,” who believe the actions of boys and men are purely or largely an effect of male socialization which can be mitigated or abolished by egalitarian and enlightened socialization. Nor MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s movement, who are obsessed with proving that males are as good or better than females and that females are as bad or worse than males and just as abusive and violent or potentially abusive and violent.

To CSA victimologists, biological men under age 16 or 18 (and even 18-year-olds if the women is a teacher or tutor like Abigail Simon) who are “chiefly interested in sex and talk about sex” and who often talk of wanting to  have sex with adult females -what heterosexual adolescent doesn’t fantasize about having sex with adult females, e.g., various celebrities, teachers, neighbors, strangers, their mother’s friends, etc.- must be protected from such women by draconian/Orwellian punishments, the enactment and enforcement of laws and policies to prevent the realization of their fantasies.  Or, for those few who “get lucky,” to end the intrigues, and the “victims” gratification, by crucifying the women who gave them the sex they craved and enjoyed.  Or to ruin their lives weeks or months or years after the affair or tryst ended when the “victims” are now adults but still “traumatized,” “scarred for life” by sex they assented to or initiated, knowingly and willingly, in some cases by force and/or threats, and enjoyed far more than the women who “raped” and “molested” them.

Does Abigail Know that Feminism is Culpable, Seminally and Predominantly, for Destroying her Life?

Tags

feminism, innate sex differences, plea-bargain, women as rapists, women sex offenders

As noted previously, in a few posts, Abigail was prohibited from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the Huron Valley Correctional Facility. To the authorities, my words were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”

Did the left-feminist ideologues and totalitarians who rule the prison and the lives of inmates believe that Abigail would have gone berserk and attacked the guards and/or other inmates, perhaps inciting a riot or mass revolt, had she been allowed to read my heterodox and “politically-incorrect” arguments and contentions. Or simply that they would have vitiated the efficacy of her “sex-offender treatment.”

So, in effect, I’m a victim of censorship, denied the right to correspond with Abigail and ask her many questions about her intrigue with a 15-year-old student and biological man, her phantasmal and theoretical “victim” whom she claims forced himself on her three times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; her arrest, prosecution, trial, why she rejected the plea-bargains, her life in jail and prison; her life, especially as an adult, before it was shattered, forever and needlessly, by the criminal justice system; her ideals, values, and opinions on various issues and subjects: e.g., what did she think of Mary Letourneau and her affair with a student and her sentence of 8-years in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration. What did she think of such laws and penalties, to the extent that she was aware of them, before they ruined her life?

Like most educated women, the overwhelming majority, alas,, I presume that Abigail is a left-liberal, probably more liberal than extreme/radical left, though I could be wrong. And, moreover, that she defines and thinks of herself as a feminist, however defined, broadly or narrowly, vaguely or precisely, accurately or inaccurately. If so, does she know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life.

In pre-feminist America, including the 1960s, the decade of  the “sexual revolution,” “statutory rape” laws didn’t even apply to women in most jurisdictions. And if they did so apply to women in some states or if women who had sex with young men under age 16 or 18 were guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, how many women were arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to jail or prison for such offenses? (Read my blog-post on Kirk Douglas) And how many were sentenced to 8-25 years in prison, like Abigail, or 6-15 years, like Kathryn Ronk, or enslaved for 8-years, like Mary Letourneau; or 40-years, like Shannon Schmeider, with a chance for parole after “only” 20 years; or life with a chance for parole after “only” 10-years, apparently, like Michelle Taylor; or 20-years with no chance for parole, like Brittany Zamora, and who knows how many other women, teachers and non-teachers, who received similar prison sentences. In pre-feminist America, was there even one woman who received such a draconian sentence for having a love affair or mere tryst with a biological man under age 18?

And even if incarcerated, none of them, upon their release, were subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet,” and registration for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, their mug-shots, names, and addresses on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

None of these laws and policies, these draconian/Orwellian punishments, inflicted on Abigail and myriads of other women for no exigent and practical reasons, would exist if not for feminism. Beginning in the early 1970s, in deference to feminism and the anti-rape movement which began, publicly and officially, in 1971 with the New York radical feminist rape conference, sex crime laws were revamped. State legislators, overwhelmingly male, enacted and imposed laws written by feminist lawyers.

De facto consensual sex between adults and young men and women under age 16 or 18, depending on the age of consent in each jurisdiction, was now a “gender-neutral” crime that applied equally to women and was equated or conflated under the law with violent-forcible rape and the rape and/or molestation of prepubescent children. And women were now defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships

Most infamously, Mary Letourneau was convicted of “child rape” under Washington law, and sentenced to almost a decade in prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration, albeit she didn’t rape her “victim,” obviously, nor did she use violence/force or threats of same to compel his submission, nor was she guilty of molesting a prepubescent child. Her victim” was the aggressor and initiator who forced himself on her the first time they had intercourse. (Read my articles and blog-posts on her case for more details and analysis.)

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was convicted of “sexual assault of a child,” which implies that she was guilty of violence/force or threats of same in sexually abusing and violating a helpless and innocent  prepubescent boy, and sentenced to 4-years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration -when, in fact, she was the victim of abuse and her “victim” was the abuser and victimizer. He was not a child, biologically, but a man in size and sexuality, a delinquent and criminal of 15 who, as her student, constantly harassed and implored her for sex at school and in her classroom, molested and kissed her against her will, and finally raped her when she visited him at home on school business, apparently when no one else was present. She didn’t report the rape lest he “go to prison and become more of a delinquent.” Exploiting her altruism and compassion, not only misguided and foolish but ill-deserved and self-destructive, he manipulated and bullied her into having sex with him in an intrigue she didn’t know how to “end without hurting him,” resulting to her arrest and all that followed,

The real criminal, sexually and otherwise, was not punished, and who knows how many crimes he committed before he raped and molested Cassandra, and who knows how manyy crimes he’s committed thereafter. Did he rape any more women or adolescent girls, or even murder someone, like the “victim” of Melissa Bittner, who was convicted of
“sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and much else because she was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old delinquent. (See the posts on her case for more details.)

Ironically and paradoxically, such iniquities and outrages and travesties, inflicted even on women who were raped and molested by their de jure “victims” but still charged with and convicted of felony sex offenses, and the draconian-Orwellian sentences, are inconceivable apart from feminism and the anti-rape movement and CSA victimology.

CSA victimology and it’s tenets and dogmas and the resultant mass-hysteria, psychosis, moral panics, witch-hunts, and imprisonment and persecution of myriads of men and women who were/are either innocent or guilty of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, overwhelmingly first-offenders who, even if not innocent, were/are not violent and dangerous, people who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society or to anyone nor even a “danger to reoffend” by having sex with another biological man or woman under statutory age – this madness and reign of terror is inconceivable apart from feminist ideology and it’s decades-long jihad against sexual victimization, real and imagined.

Nor would adult women who have sex with young men under statutory age be absurdly defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” if not for feminism and the myth and premise that men and women and boys and girls are exactly the same apart from the inescapable differences in anatomy and the conflation of prepubescent boys and girls with pubescent male and female adolescents. And even the inescapable differences in anatomy and their relevance to and importance in sexual postures and possibilities are denied and trivialized as irrelevant and insignificant by feminists and others (most fanatically, obsessively, and viciously by MRA, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement”) who define and vilify adult women as “rapists” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships  “sex-equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes,” to quote John Derbyshire, and the only crime in which the “victim” enjoys the actus reus (i.e. the sex) more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.” Nor would young men under age 16 or even 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women be defined as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who are “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

Abigail was convicted of “criminal sexual misdonduct,” a vague term, legally and empircally, under which all sorts of sex-acts that are now crimes, nearly always felonies, are subsumed: everything from violent-forcible rape, iinclding the most sadistic, brutal, vicious rapes and gang-rapes, truly “heinous” crimes that often also involve aggravated assault, kidnapping, “false imprisonment,” home invasions, torture, mutilation, and murder; to the molestation of prepubescent children; to factually consensual sex between adults and young men and women under statutory age, including women who are convicted of felonies for having sex with biological men under age 16 or 18 (or even 18-year-olds if the women is a teacher or tutor like Abigail and the “victim” is a student under her authority.

In contrast, legally and empirically, “statutory rape” is not a vaguely defined criminal offense. It defines, clearly and accurately, a specific and objective act. The modifying “statutory” denotes an absence of violent/force or threats of same to compel the submission of the “victim” -i.e., it reveals that the sex was consensual, factually as opposed to legally- while “rape” signifies the reality of penile-vaginal penetration, an act which only males can perpetrate. Thus even to define the women above as “statutory rapists” and their “crimes” as “statutory rape” is objectively and empirically false and thus absurd.

To repeat: Does Abigail know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life, culpable for her sentence of 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether she can never remove and public sex-offender registration. And so, too, now and in the past and future, he women above and far too many others whose lives have been and will be blighted or destroyed by modern feminism and CSA victimology.